SagXD@lemm.ee to cats@lemmy.world · 9 months agoProtesting for tunalemm.eeimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up124arrow-down10
arrow-up124arrow-down1imageProtesting for tunalemm.eeSagXD@lemm.ee to cats@lemmy.world · 9 months agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squareTimwi@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoThose are all fair points. Still unfortunate that it’s still down to money even in your explanation, but it makes sense.
minus-squareNoel_Skum@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoYeah. Good point. I should’ve explicitly said in a final sentence that the decision ultimately comes down to protecting / increasing shareholder profit and management bonuses; and nothing else.
Those are all fair points. Still unfortunate that it’s still down to money even in your explanation, but it makes sense.
Yeah. Good point. I should’ve explicitly said in a final sentence that the decision ultimately comes down to protecting / increasing shareholder profit and management bonuses; and nothing else.