• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Here is the entire response. As far as i understand it boils to “we got a lawyer now”

    The rest of this link is just blabala this happend, nitendo said blababla

    They could have literally summarized this within a single headline.

    And for the record OP, so could have you.

    • Sidyctism@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Its pretty standard fare that if you post an article, you use its headline as the post headline

      • Usually_Lurker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s the beauty of Lenny, we can change the “Standard Fare”. I would much rather a post title that completely conveys the idea at hand rather than the confusing/ flat out wrong/or clickbait titles we get from “news” sites. The only thing that should be mandatory is a link to the article where you found the information.

        • Corgana@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I agree, /r/news started that policy because users would sensationalize the articles further and they didn’t have enough mods to monitor if every submission was being taken out of context.

          Lemmy doesn’t have the same growth incentives as reddit so hopefully we can make things better here.