IMO framing this as a way to protect the feelings of the poster sets us up to debate how people should react to downvotes. That was my initial reaction, anyway. It’s not a productive discussion, too much judgement.

But there are heaps of other good reasons why you might want to just show a single number (upvotes minus downvotes), for everyone, not just when viewing one’s own content.

• cleaner, less cluttered UI
• simpler code?
• people don’t need to know how many downvotes a comment got (their own comments OR other people’s), all that really matters is the aggregate score

Reddit and PieFed both just show one number - the score - and it works fine. On PieFed you can hover your mouse over the score to get a tooltip that breaks it down into up and down but afaik no one cares.

If other people can see that I got downvoted a lot but I can’t then every little snarky comment about how many downvotes I’m getting is going to trigger extreme FOMO and the urge to turn the downvote hiding feature off. An unknown amount of downvotes is worse than knowing how many downvotes there are.

You want to be more welcoming to the people who freak out about downvotes? The people for whom the slightest criticism is a huge problem?

Title updated.

I think this is a case where changing it to “lies” won’t violate the community rule “Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive”…

I’ll keep the sh.itjust.works one for a few weeks so we can go back to it if the move doesn’t work out.

lol, good to know!

The study showed that the AI bots were between 3 and 6 times more persuasive than humans. And the study also mentioned that their bots were not recognized as AI, ever. Not once.

We are now at the point where the side with the most AI wins elections.

Guess which side has the most AI.

Results of the study:

Notably, all our treatments surpass human performance substantially, achieving persuasive rates between three and six times higher than the human baseline.

UP TO 6 TIMES MORE PERSUASIVE!!1

we demonstrate that LLMs can be highly persuasive in real-world contexts, surpassing all previously known benchmarks of human persuasiveness. Their effectiveness also opens the door to misuse, potentially en-
abling malicious actors to sway public opinion [12] or orchestrate election interference cam-
paigns [21]. Incidentally, our experiment confirms the challenge of distinguishing human- from
AI-generated content [22–24]. Throughout our intervention, users of r/ChangeMyView never
raised concerns that AI might have generated the comments posted by our accounts. This hints
at the potential effectiveness of AI-powered botnets [25], which could seamlessly blend into on-
line communities .

Oh shit.

I’m conflicted.

Making those poor bastards work 12 hour days, 6 days per week for small money is pretty fucked.

Sending them to somewhere that may be a death camp is worse tho.

Feels like the article set up a false dichotomy.

You’re going to have to prioritise.

Find changes that:

Save a decent amount of money Are low risk Don’t take too long to do Can be easily backed-out of

Yup. In PieFed you can get an alert based on comments on a post, comments in reply to a comment, posts in a community, posts in a topic, posts in a feed, or posts done by a particular person. We’re really gone to town on it.

There are probably a variety of mindsets that will do it.

For me, I think it was just really wanting to get away from being under the boot. Get away from the walled gardens. Like that feeling after using LinkedIn, except for the OS. Hearing the call of freedom, authenticity and humanity.

Increasing amounts of code running on my computer and in the online services I use will be written by generative AI.

Emphasis added by me.

Thing is, it’s not black and white most of the time - usually a developer is using Gen AI as an assistant in some capacity. There are a wide range of ways to do that with really big differences in how firmly their hand remains on the wheel of where things are going. Only in the most extreme “vibe coding” scenario would it be fair to characterize the code as “written by AI”.

There reaches a point somewhere on the spectrum of dependency on AI where quality would suffer and developer capacity-building would be stunted. Where that point is, is a more productive question than a binary Yes or No to all AI.

Yeah there’s really no coming back from this. He could go to work at Testa 14 days per week and it wouldn’t make any difference. That brand is toast.

It’s refreshing to see a major publication just flatly stating that he’s a fascist.

Prices are set by supply and demand, not by sellers thinking the market can bear it. If a baker raises their prices then eaters can just go to a different baker.

If demand increases because fewer people are struggling AND supply can’t increase at the same rate then yes there could be price increases. But it’s because of the demand, not just because the sellers want it.

In the case of housing where supply can’t increase very quickly, yeah rents could go up a bit. So there needs to be plenty of new social housing built by the government alongside UBI, to supply enough to meet demand.

Some other inflationary effects could be counteracted by taxing the shit out of the rich.

UBI at nation-state scale wouldn’t happen in isolation, there would be various other policies happening at the same time.

I heard you like spreadsheets so I put a spreadsheet in your game so you can spreadsheet while you game

lol the guy running behind it carrying a wifi router

“Do you regularly watch videos by Jordan Peterson?” kinda needs to become one of those before-first-date screening questions.

It’s on the radar, yes.

Cool, but now SSH into a remote server and then try to open nano. It doesn’t.

After using it for 3 weeks I concluded that as Kitty breaks the fundamentals all the nice shiny isn’t worth it.