For those who are unaware: A couple billionaires, a pilot, and one of the billionaires’ son are currently stuck inside an extremely tiny sub a couple thousand meters under the sea (inside of the sub with the guys above).

They were supposed to dive down to the titanic, but lost connection about halfway down. They’ve been missing for the past 48 hours, and have 2 days until the oxygen in the sub runs out. Do you think they’ll make it?

    • Willer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is only so much others can regulate when you are building an inverted rocketship

      • SoPunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are paying their price right now. Other dives have gone much deeper, safer. This guy is a fly by night con guy in my opinion.

        Read the Bloomberg piece in him.

        By the way used to work a lot in defense procurement. There are a ton of regs they do follow, though they sure as hell don’t care about RoHs for the most part.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is going to come up in engineering safety classes for years. If the CEO says safety is a pure waste, you need to leave that job.

            • zeppo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              He has a slightly valid point, that at some extent safety can be overdone and you’re wasting time and money. However… repeated instances without a disaster (short of say, decades worth) don’t prove safety precautions are unnecessary, but one catastrophe can prove the the opposite.

              • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s his examples that makes me think he wasn’t serious on safety overall. There’s different kinds of risks and we take them on every day, but everyday risks are way less deadly. It’s disingenuous to brush off safety for a sub heading 13k feet down into the ocean by talking about the risks of driving.

                • zeppo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh, definitely. His examples are somewhat like “if you would fly on a a commercial jetliner, why not be an experimental pilot or an astronaut?” or “if you’d take a trip to a hiking area near your house, why not climb Mt. Everest?”

      • kylegordon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a desire for low regulation, and then there’s wilful disregard of what professional bodies are saying…