AI summary:
A Chilean journalist, Gonzalo Lira, who had been living in Ukraine, was arrested by the Security Service of Ukraine on suspicion of pro-Russian sympathies and criticizing the government. He had been detained before in April, released, and then rearrested for voicing views critical of the West and Ukraine’s government. He faced torture while imprisoned, then managed to post bail but decided to flee to Hungary for political asylum. He believed the Ukrainian government was setting him up to be arrested again. He went missing after attempting to cross the Ukrainian-Hungarian border. The situation highlighted concerns about free speech and the treatment of dissenters in Ukraine.
I thought of this hearing you use the word tankie to describe someone sharing their opinion. Everyone you don’t agree with is a tankie am I right?
You’re probably being called a tankie because you’re posing Russian propaganda and acting like daddy vladdy’s media is somehow better than western media. It’s hilarious that you think you’re more informed when your video is using media from unapologetic liars (and that’s also a good description of Dore himself).
You can call Western media liars and propagandists, but if you’re posing Russian media unironically while doing so, no one is going to pay attention to your opinion because it’s clearly uninformed and entirely pants on head.
It’s really not pants on head. The Western propaganda machine immediately crucifies anyone saying anything bad about Ukraine. War crimes in Donbas? “You’re trying to undermine the Ukraine cause!” The US helped engineer a regime change in Ukraine in 2014 that resulted in civil war? “But they’re democratic now!” (By the way, see the parallels to Iraq there?) NATO, which was once thought defunct after the fall of the Soviet Union, building bases on Russian border? “Well, they’re authoritarian and need to be contained!”
Well, Russia felt threatened and took the bait and invaded Ukraine (not justified, by the way. Still wrong.) And now, how many billions of dollars are going to the Ukraine war effort from the US? And you cant say a bad thing about Ukraine without being vilified as a Putinist.
I mean, someone the other day told me “the only anti-war stance is to send more weapons to Ukraine so they can end this war faster.” What? That’s like saying “the only way to end the conflict in Vietnam is to send the southern Vietnamese more troops so they can destroy the northern communists faster.” Nah, an anti-war position is leaving Ukraine to defend themselves.
For the US, this is not aiding a democratic country against an authoritarian regime. If this were really about democracy vs authoritarianism, we’d be sending weapons to Palestine against the authoritarian state of Israel. But since Israel is a useful tool under our thumb, that’s not going to happen. This is a proxy war that we wanted so that the people can have an easy person to hate (just like in the middle east), justified in the name of “democracy” (pro-western government US helped install, also like Middle East), and furthered by billions and billions of dollars worth of weapons and aid packages, paid to defense firms like BAE and Raytheon.
I don’t think ukraine can win this war and take back all their territory, including Crimea. And that’s good for the US, because war is profitable and having an adversarial country like Russia (for Republicans, it’s China) is politically advantageous.
Edit: BTW, this is not all to say that the OP is true. I’ve not been able to verify the veracity of the disappearance of this journalist, the most reputable source being https://twitter.com/MarkSleboda1/status/1686619514211868672?s=20 who reports from a Russia PoV. I think it’s important to maintain that Russian PoV =/= Russian propaganda, but still important to be skeptical.
I’ve mentioned in a previous comment that both Russian and US media can be seen as propaganda. I value them equally and believe they hold similar importance. It’s essential for people to consider various perspectives before forming conclusions. I label US media as propaganda because it’s predominantly consumed, but the same applies to media from any other country.