• ActuallyASeal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    In other towns where this is allowed, a representative of the entity, not the actual owner, was able to cast the ballot for the company after signing the necessary affidavit. Delaware allows for the owner of the LLC’s identity to not be public.

    Yep no way this doesn’t-

    In a Newark referendum election in 2019, a property manager was able to vote 31 times because he was in control of 31 LLCs, which owned 31 parcels of land. The city then changed its regulations after this became public.

    Ah it already did cause problems.

    Why in the world would you put business on the same legal basis of actual citizens?

      • MercuryUprising@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        But it won’t be, because the inner circle elites are the kind of people who be able to abuse this, hence why it is even considered in the first place.

      • ActuallyASeal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Citizens United at least had some hand wavy group rights derived from each individual’s rights going for it.

        This is basically buy your way to vote in any local election.

        <s>Because as a business owner you have exactly as much say in a locality’s government as someone who actually lives there. Or even more of they don’t fix the “each LLC gets a vote not the owner loophole”.<\s>