• _number8_@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    24 days ago

    since this country has such a long evil and stupid history there are probably more documents you could pull out against this, rather than just being normal and evaluating the law on ‘does it seem normal or moral to ban this’ like a human fucking being would. almost like ConStITuTUiOnALiTy is a dumb fucking way validate the law.

    oh and what, at least half of these guys are outlandishly corrupt but still get to sit there?

    just send out little ballots in the mail for every case instead of relying on these scum, jesus.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      rather than just being normal and evaluating the law on ‘does it seem normal or moral to ban this’

      This is the job of the legislature. To make law based on norms and morals, as well as a dozen other factors.

      almost like ConStITuTUiOnALiTy is a dumb fucking way validate the law

      The job of the judiciary is to rule based on what the various laws say, which obviously includes the Constitution.

      Do you really want the judiciary ignoring the law and legislating from the bench? Remember, your preferred group isn’t the one in the majority.

      • _number8_@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        24 days ago

        oh well that seems like such an elegant system, thank god it’s working so well. let’s keep defending it.