• kukkurovaca@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is surfacing a fundamental division between mindsets in federation: the people who say don’t worry about which instance you’re on are bought into the promise that federation can “just work” like email. But the reality is that if you care about moderation at all (like, even to the extent of being for or against having any of it) then sooner or later you’re going to have to make harder decisions about instances.

    It’s pretty normal for long-term fediverse users to change instances several times over the course of however long this stuff has been around. It’s unclear to me whether any existing Lemmy instances would be a good fit for me in the long term TBH and I would expect that to be true for some time, as so many instances are still figuring things out internally.

    Defederation decisions like beehaw made are extremely normal and rational. With their level of moderation staffing and for their user base, they determined it was unsustainable to remain federated with instances that were generating more moderation workload. If it wasn’t them today it would be another instance tomorrow; this will keep happening.

    Also, I see a lot of folks saying this is lazy for beehaw, but it’s important to understand that from their perspective, this problem wouldn’t arise if moderators here were keeping a cleaner house and preventing bad actors from using the platform. (Not saying either take is entirely correct.)

    In a sense, moderation best practices on the fediverse are inimically hostile to scaling the fediverse up to new users. (And if you ask folks with smaller but prosperous instances that have healthy internal vibes, they’ll probably tell you this is good.)

    This is much more fraught on Lemmy than it is on Mastodon, because you’re building communities hosted on a particular instance and there’s not currently a way to move the community. So, if I were to start a community here and then finally decide a year from now that this place is too big a defederation target to stay on, what do I do?

    Similarly, to avoid endless duplication of communities, folks have been encouraged to participate with existing communities instead of starting a new one on their own instance everytime. But anyone here who has gotten involved with communities on Beehaw will now no longer be able to do so unless they move to a different instance. (Which may be hard, as open instances that are easy to join are the ones that are harder for small instances to handle, which is what caused this in the first place.)

    Some of those folks are going to create their own alternative communities on their servers, which to any third-party servers not in the loop on the defederation drama will be potentially confusing. This has the potential to create a cultural tend toward polarization of community norms between everything goes and what we see on Mastodon as content warning policing, but of which are, to me, undesirable.

    The best case scenario is that the majority of large communities end up being hosted on instances that have sufficiently rigorous moderation standards and sufficiently robust moderation staff to not impose an unsustainable workload on smaller instances. Then as long as everyone who’s not a nazi federates with those instances, things should go smoothly…ish. But that’s hard both because “sufficiently rigorous” is different for everyone and because moderation labor doesn’t grow on trees.

    • livejamie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The part where things get tricky is that beehaw currently has ~15 of the top 50 communities across the entire fediverse and has become the defacto discussion grounds for gaming/tech/news/etc.

      One could argue this goes against the whole concept of decentralized communication in the first place, and this may be a position beehaw doesn’t want to be in.

      Beehaw has every right to foster a tight-knit community that adheres to its desires.

      But there also is a level of responsibility and custodianship over these large communities they foster for the betterment and adoption of the fediverse.

      • lmaydev@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess the others will need to work with them to fix the issues that resulted in this decision.

        It’s all about teamwork across the verse and we’ll have to see if they can manage it.

    • xor@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      btw, e-mail servers regularly defederate/block domains that allow a lot of spam…

    • jcg@halubilo.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very cogent writeup, seeing how the lemmy.world people were reacting really validated Beehaw’s decision in my eyes. People are getting really angry, and I wonder if those were the same people who bought into the whole “lemmys great because no one has 100% control” idea, only to be upset when the person in control of a slice they like decides they want to do something disagreeable with it. In the first place, one community shouldn’t have carried the burden of the entire content and community of the “Gaming” or “Technology” sphere, it just kind of turned out that way because once they gained momentum, everybody else just flocked to it. And you can’t blame them, that’s where the content is, and the content is why they’re here.

      On the whole, though the software doesn’t really restrict you to one or the other, instances are very quickly separating into two camps - viewer and host. Viewer instances are instances like mine, where the majority of users are consumers and not creators. Yeah, I like to run my mouth around these parts but most of the content on my instance doesn’t originate from it. The host instances host communities, and so they carry the burden of having to moderate those communities and the servers/sysadmins carry the burden of having to relay all that communication to all the other instances. I think it’s this part that needs work as we grow, because the best analogy for a Lemmy community is an email group. Can you imagine an email group with tens of thousands of subscribers all just emailing each other over and over again? Lemmy is pretty much just that, but displayed differently.

      • deva@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        seeing how the lemmy.world people were reacting really validated Beehaw’s decision in my eyes

        I think people have a right to be upset when they feel unfairly banned from communities for no fault of their own.

  • MeowdyPardner@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s easy to take this personally but I think it’s more about the moderation tools in Lemmy not being adequate at the moment so this is the best bandaid solution for now. We need to quickly put effort into developing better moderation tools like limiting other servers without fully defederating, limiting specific communities, forcing nsfw on communities/instances, proxying reports to origin servers so admins have better feedback on their instance user’s bad behavior, and many other things if we want to prevent defederating like this from being the only option.

    I think infighting about this decision and differing moderation styles instead of focusing together on moderation challenges and tooling deficiencies risks tearing the community / federation apart and is counterproductive to the goal of being better than reddit.

    • discodoubloon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. They do deserve their own points if they want to be that type of community. I’d say for instance if places like AskHistorians arise within lemmy or kbin, federating with just those would be interesting.

      There are always going to be more exclusive communities. Humans just work like that. I say we ride with it for now.

      Federation should be a gradient. If they want to close themselves off why is it using ActivityPub to begin with?

      • cloaker@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        its _ federation._ Some communities only want certain people. Once mod tools are better we will see changes. Let it grow.

  • MysticSmear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    as someone who just joined, and is still trying to understand “federated” can someone give me an ELI5 rundown of what this means? I thought it didn’t matter which instance you joined because they were all connected, does this mean that other instances can just… block an entire instance?

    • iSharted@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s essentially like email. If you have a gmail, you can communicate with anyone on any other email service. If gmail determines that spamsite.xyz, you won’t send or recieve any emails from that domain. Same thing here. You’re using lemmy.world. If lemmy.world defederates with my server sh.itjust.works, you won’t see my messages. We will just never cross paths.

      • MysticSmear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        hmm…that seems super counterintuitive to what I thought the fediverse was all about. That would be like Gmail just deciding all Yahoo emails are spam. doesn’t this mean that Lemmy will just be a bunch of islands of content that will require users to have multiple accounts for each instance?

        • iSharted@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If everyone plays nice, you get to have really big islands. But that’s only if your overlords (the mods) allow it. If they don’t like an instance, see ya! I don’t think this happens often other than blocking spam and illegal activity, but you can clearly see how this will make all the mini islands.

          • MysticSmear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think people tend to be tribal by nature. It would likely be folly to think everyone will not use petty squabbles and minor disagreements to cut off other people they disagree with for the first time in history. This could really hurt lemmy in the long run if everyone only lives on their island.

        • Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Apparently the main issue is that the “ALL” feed starts showing posts of other instances when one user subscribes to anything there. So if e.g. you don’t block a NSFW instance, you will have popular porn posts showing up on your instance as well.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What if someone from lemmy.world makes a comment, and someone from lemmy.ca replies to the comment?

        Would someone from sh.itjust.works see the reply to the original comment but not the original comment? Or is the whole thread after that point non-existent after that point?

  • oh_so_hazey@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can completely understand why they did but it really sucks that it had to happen. Hopefully, as the Fediverse grows, better tools are made available so instances don’t need to defederate from each other.

    With that said, I think it’s a pretty amazing concept that they can. Terrible, sure, but nonetheless amazing.

    I also wasn’t aware that other instances vetted their users? This was the first one I picked. Is there a plan to address the issues beehaw brought up?

  • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They made the users suffer for their unwillingness to cope with their situation.

    Instead of planning ahead and only accepting a limited amount of users, which would have severed only a fraction of users from us, they decided to grow to become one of the biggest instances, and now took some interesting communities with them, along with cutting off their own users from communities here.

    I hope their user base migrates to other, more open instances, and the communities lost will spring into existence elsewhere.

    • mercurly@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow… I’m new here so I’m still learning how all this works but I tried to apply to beehaw at first and they were having severe issues with their approval system so I either got denied or, most likely, got stuck in application purgatory.

      Honestly, with how Lemmy is set up, it seems like it makes more sense to cater your instance to a more niche crowd than “all nice people” like beehaw was attempting to do.

      • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m new here too, could someone explain the difference between Lemmy and Beehaw (and kbin which it looks like this is posted on?) and what it means that they’re defederated?

        • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          beehaw.org is a Lemmy instance (server). kbin is a platform similar to Lemmy and it can federate with Lemmy instances, as well as integrate with them nicely (not the case with Mastodon and Lemmy/kbin). Defederation means cutting off ties with a certain instance. Beehaw defederated from sh.itjust.works and lemmy.world, which means that their users won’t be able to see posts from these instances. On the other hand, members of sh.itjust.works and lemmy.world will be able to see beehaw’s communities and posts, but can’t post in them. A bit of a clusterfuck, I know.

          • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I appreciate the explanation. Are there any good articles that run down the way this whole thing is organized?

            • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              IDK, I learned this allong the way (empirically). Try Google, might return something relevant. Try search terms like “fediverse defederate”, things like that.

      • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s most regrettable is the timing. Just when Lemmy had a big growth spurt, they cut off a big part of the community. We’ll likely see this happen again in 2 weeks, when Reddit shuts down all 3rd party mobile apps, and again when they close old.reddit. I hope that some of the issues Lemmy currently faces will be fixed by then.

        • TiffyBelle@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d argue it’s perfect timing. Better that users across the broader fediverse know now that supporting Beehaw communities and helping them to grow with content won’t be in the best interests of the fediverse more broadly, and to put their time and effort into communities hosted elsewhere before they’d grown even larger.

  • lvl@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, look at the bright side: the evolution of descentralized federation now depends on the moderation topic. I wouldn’t be surprised if someone takes federation to the next level and creates a moderation tool which would work out of the box for the fediverse, at the technology level (e.g. ActivityPub).

    If and when this happens, federation has a bigger chance in replacing current centralized social networks.

  • sverit@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t bothered beehaw users just simply block the instances they don’t like by themselfes? Does this have to be instance-wide?

    • Chefdano3@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The issue they stated wasn’t with other federated communities, but with the users from those federated instances spamming their communities. Beehaw has a strict account policy and only want users they’ve personally vetted commenting and posting in their communities. So in effect they are blocking instances they’ve determined to be problematic by defederating them. At least that’s my understanding of it.

      • sverit@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The issue they stated wasn’t with other federated communities, but with the users from those federated instances spamming their communities.

        Yes, I understand that, but this seems to be effectively the same. Why not leave the decision to the individual users?

        Beehaw has a strict account policy and only want users they’ve personally vetted commenting and posting in their communities.

        Well, the fediverse kind of seems to be the wrong choice for them, then. It lives from the federation. If you want to be isolated it’s just a plain old forum.

        • DJSchaffner@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Seems like you are missing the point a bit.
          Because of the open registration policy of those instances and the many users they do not have the necessary tools and manpower to moderate harassing and offensive posts which go against their policy (which they can absolutely set as they want, since it’s their instance) so they block the users of those instances from posting and commenting for the time being.
          So it’s not about isolation themselves just for the sake of being and exclusive club of people but because the moderators can’t handle the amount of traffic

          • sverit@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Blocking all users from those instances still feels like overkill for me. Just let the beehaw users block the offensive users from other instaces if they feel they need to? That would be far more selective.

            • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Doesn’t that just put the onus on blocking communities onto the individual user? If that’s the case, then why bother joining a community like Beehaw - which is marked as a Safe Space for folk?

              Personally, I feel it’s within their rights to block communities with open signup rules, at least until better moderation tools are present.

        • Chefdano3@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I also thought it was weird to make a federated Instance and also try to have a human review application process. Sounds kinda silly to me.

            • Chefdano3@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              When you go to create an account on beehaw, they have a questionnaire you have to fill out with questions like “what do you plan to contribute to beehaw?” and then one of the 4 admins that run beehaw have to read your answers and then approve or reject.

              I don’t blame them for being a small team running a forum and want to keep trolls and spam out, but it sounds like they are trying to have the best of 2 contradictory worlds. with the selective tight group of like minded individuals, but also have their communities reach a large audience and grow interaction. It just unfortunately doesn’t work that way.

              But now these 4 admins stumbled into hosting the some of largest popular communities in the fediverse and are struggling to handle the bullcrap that comes with being popular on the internet.

  • tallwookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    eh I just read through the post over there, I suppose their concerns are somewhat valid, to a point, but there really isnt a “safe space” anywhere except between your ears.

    really just reads like excuses to being lazy.

  • Lund3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I specifically just deleted my beehaw account and created one here because of this… This move makes me reconsider this whole lemmy thing.

    • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, me as well. Seems kbin has a way more open minded view on things. They don’t defederate from anyone, which suits me just fine. I wouldn’t like to defederated from anyone, including lemmygrad. There are some interesting reads over there (at least for me).

    • Zoness@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find it really frustrating to build up a feed of content, only to lose it when moderator fights begin. What servers are next? Which one do I join to get the most content?

      I want this to succeed but I don’t know how I can recommend it to people today, since they’re going to ask the same questions.

    • SlowNoPoPo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah, was starting to like it here, but honestly if any instance will just defederate the second something inconvenient happens… we won’t have a site with good content that will keep people around

    • goat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But isn’t that good? It means you have much more freedom now, you can make communities, post more stuff, don’t have to follow a non existant set of rules.

      • llama@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s true but there are nuanced social consequences for the entire group because of the actions one or a few individuals. The moderation model of Lemmy will be different and needs to start at the home instance. Because all it takes is a few people to act up and suddenly your instance has no content.

    • Alice@exploding-heads.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      DUDE SAME The whole point was that we want a place that # ISNT CENSORED. Or getting banned because something I said offends you.

      Like I’ve gotta learn all this shit and read a 600 page instruction manual about how to use lemmy, but I can’t call someone a faggot (Talking about when someone says some lame ass shit, not calling gay people faggots)

      • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Have you tried 4chan? Because I’m pretty sure you make a great chan stan and would love all the childish channing.

        Also, maybe try updating your vocabulary? Learn more words so you don’t have to always sound like an angry, edgy, child.

      • bood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you want to call people faggots for no reason like it’s 2003 just >>>/b/ dude, it didn’t go anywhere. They’ll probably reply to you with a bunch of (images of) dicks though. If it quacks like a duck…

  • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not a good look. I get its the admins choice and all but it just wiped out a lot of my subscriptions. Its not a good look from the perspective of new users and increases the number of duplicate communities across instances.

    I had hopes for it but I guess I’m one of the lucky ones who signed up for lemmy.world.

    I think they should just ban problematic users not the whole instance.

    • areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They could also just use a whitelist of users who are allowed to comment/post on there. I have suggested as much but we will see how they respond. I might try and contact a mod over there if that’s possible.

      Edit: I’ve been told by another user that this isn’t currently supported. I think it would be a good feature to add to lemmy.

    • Googleproof@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I can get their desire to vet users before they can join their instance, but for me (and I suspect a lot of other people who are just starting with Lemmy, or just shy people) the effort of making a social interaction with a stranger was enough of a turn off that I went elsewhere. Beehaw still seems nice, I may still make an account there at some point. But, to figure out if a place suits me, first I lurk, then I engage by voting, then I engage by commenting, and eventually I may eventually post. I get applications, but they feel intrusive to how I use the internet.

      I also get why they defederated, frankly there’s a tonne of low effort from the big new instances. However, everyone should expect low effort right now because users are antsy from having left reddit, and the low effort posts are the anxious laughter of people new to the party who don’t know anyone yet. So the defederation isn’t a good look, and will cause bad feeling with and within beehaw, so their mods have my sympathy. Better to have enabled downvoting and let the community handle the low effort posts.

  • LostCause@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It‘s the bubble concept I already curated for myself on Reddit by filtering out what feels like half the website. Except now I can sort of choose my pre-made bubble, which is more effort to be certain (have to research the admins of a chosen instance a bit and understand their rules and values), but I don‘t mind that.

  • Faceman🇦🇺@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    beehaw are trying to be a perfectly moderated and “high quality” community and they are struggling to keep up with it when federated to other large instances.

    I think they might need to change their methods because it is inevitable that some crap is going to be going on in low effort posts and comments, but defederating one very large instance from other very large instances is against the whole idea the movement.

    • tonsilectomy@thegarden.land
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well I’ll take this opportunity to invite everyone over to The Garden : a bed for gardeners and everyone else to grow their roots and thrive. We have open registration and community creation.

      • sweetholymosiah@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is confusing to create an entire instance that is devoted to one thing. I would much prefer joining The Garden as a community @ whatever instance you choose. I think you are going against the basic design intentions of the fediverse. All the best.

    • EnglishMobster@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      https://fedia.io does.

      But bear in mind that this is just the knee-jerk reaction of the admins at Beehaw; they will likely defederate with any community that has open sign-ups.

      Beehaw wants to promote a certain culture within their instance. That’s well within their prerogative - but I think they’re beginning to understand why the fediverse may not be the place to do such things.

      The fediverse is designed to link instances with niche communities together. If I had an instance about model-making, there’d be communities for model trains and model rockets and dioramas and Warhammer blah blah blah. These would be a bunch of separate - but related - topics, held under one instance.

      That’s how the fediverse is designed to work. You have a bunch of people who share a specific interest on a “home” instance, and if they wish to talk about other things then they connect to other instances and grab communities to assemble their custom homepage. Great examples of this are lemmy.blahaj.zone (LGBTQ-focused instance), rblind.com (accessibility-focused instance), and even the much-maligned Lemmygrad (tankie instance).

      You focus on the communities you want and block the ones you are opposed to. Each instance has a discrete subject matter and specialty. You could have an instance which only allows verified scientists and historians to replicate AskScience and AskHistorians, and people who are “verified” will have it as their home instance.


      What has actually happened is people want to make Reddit 2. And this isn’t the fault of the users; indeed, I’d say the fact that lemmy.ml exists as a dev-run general-purpose instance violates this very philosophy the fediverse has.

      Beehaw wants to operate under the way the fediverse “should” work; i.e. Beehaw.org is a small community dedicated to a certain mission, with subjects that relate to that mission. The issue is that their mission is very close (but not quite) to being “be Reddit 2”.

      They want to have a tight-knit community where everyone knows each other and everyone can look at all sorts of content, with strict moderation to prevent the worst of social media showing up on a platform. They want to be a “hub” where people make a home, and their users would be able to dip in to more specific instances if they needed something.

      The issue is that the fediverse is a two-way street. I think Beehaw is just now realizing that. They set themselves up as a “general instance” and found wild success. But the “tight-knit community” part is hard when any rando can make an account on another instance and talk to them.

      I think Beehaw mostly wants it to be a one-way interaction - their users can participate in other instances, but outside users can’t directly talk to their instance. That’s the only reasonable way for them to accomplish their goals, but that’s not how Lemmy really works, at least not right now.

      Add to this that people are flooding in constantly. They want to be in “Reddit 2”. The fediverse supports such things - lemmy.world, sh.itjust.works, fedia.io, kbin.social, etc. are all great examples - but that’s not how it was designed to be used. Beehaw is an older community, one founded with thoughts of the “ideal” fediverse… but it’s becoming obvious that (like Mastodon) users are going to gravitate towards the familiar and make everything general-purpose.