Credit Andy Singer 2024

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    A one state solution doesn’t mean that everyone in Israel would have to leave. It would just mean that everyone in the region gets an equal voice in governance. Many people would probably choose to leave, in the same way many people left South Africa when their system of apartheid ended.

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Eh… I’m just… Not sure a one-state solution would end well, even if you could get past the US. It’s not that I like Israel, I hate everything that Israel is doing right now. I’m absolutely disgusted by the way they’ve been treating the Palestinians. However, I also don’t want to see more violence and bloodshed. I’ve been sickened by the never ending march of dead bodies that our horrid, god-forsaken species seems to crave.

      I want a solution that will result in the least amount of violence and death, and I think something like a two-state solution is more likely to achieve that than telling Israelis that they’re now under Palestinian control.

      • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        One state with all citizens as first class ones.

        Two States mean there will be always a frontier and the hate and grudge will never disappear.