• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Are you saying that geolocation of a starlink unit is difficult from the starlink satellite network?

    In 99% of cases? No. In the case of a state actor intentionally wanting to obsfucate the location? Absolutely.

    Do you see a moral dimension to this?

    You’re either missing the point or ignoring it. If you bothered to read around that sentence, you’d realize that in context it has nothing to do with morals, and everything to do with other companies with a financial incentive failing to do it. If a company loses out on 75+% of their profit when I pay for YouTube out of India, and fail to stop me despite active efforts, how do you expect a company to manage it against a state actor.

    • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      Yputube ignore it because it is cheaper to ignore than to pay people to fight against it. If enough people do it don’t worry they will fund and find methods to block user using VPN to pay abonnement