Timely_Jellyfish_2077@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoReasoning failures highlighted by Apple research on LLMsappleinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1233arrow-down111 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1222arrow-down1external-linkReasoning failures highlighted by Apple research on LLMsappleinsider.comTimely_Jellyfish_2077@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square59fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareWalnutLum@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down2·2 months agoI still think it’s better to refer to LLMs as “stochastic lexical indexes” than AI
minus-squareexocortex@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down3·2 months agoAI in general is a shitty term. It’s mostly PR. The Term “Intelligence” is very fuzzy and difficult to define - especially for people who are not in the field of machine learning.
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoSo for those in ML it’s easier?
minus-squareflying_sheep@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoNo it’s not, that’s why some smart people are starring by defining a more interesting concept: educability.
I still think it’s better to refer to LLMs as “stochastic lexical indexes” than AI
AI in general is a shitty term. It’s mostly PR. The Term “Intelligence” is very fuzzy and difficult to define - especially for people who are not in the field of machine learning.
So for those in ML it’s easier?
No it’s not, that’s why some smart people are starring by defining a more interesting concept: educability.