• Nurgus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    “Revolution only ever results in a change of masters”

    “One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship.”

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 days ago

          I’m not sure why you’re arguing in favour of literal slavery, but ok. There are other examples:

          • Bavaria in 1919
          • Spain with the CNT/FAI in the 1930s
          • The 1905 revolution in Russia, along with the 1917 revolution
          • Nurgus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            25 days ago

            I’m not arguing for slavery, you’re misunderstanding the quote. I didn’t say the change of masters was inherently no better than the previous masters.

            Revolution is always, in every example, a doorway for powerhungry authoritarians to swoop in.

            The fact that Haitians were eventually much better off than as slaves doesn’t change that.

            • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              25 days ago

              Revolution is always, in every example, a doorway for powerhungry authoritarians to swoop in.

              I disagree. Like I said: CNT/FAI Catalonia, 1919 Bavaria and anarchist Ukraine are counterexamples.

              If a revolution is thorough enough to eradicate the hierarchical structure of oppression, it doesn’t have to be used by authoritarians.