Matthew Allen’s AI art won first prize at the Colorado State Fair. But the US government has ruled it can’t be copyrighted because it’s too much “machine” and not enough “human.”

Why This Award-Winning Piece of AI Art Can’t Be Copyrighted::Matthew Allen’s AI art won first prize at the Colorado State Fair. But the US government has ruled it can’t be copyrighted because it’s too much “machine” and not enough “human.”

        • sapient [they/them]@infosec.pubEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          Depends on how radical we’re talking.

          On the less radical side - UBI, donations, contracts for creation of art that people want even if it’s not copyrighted afterward, Convenience Factor (often used by FOSS projects), and also the fact that a lot of art is created and intended for free redistribution anyhow .

          On the more radical side: re-examining our entire concept of work and labour and rent, decentralused gift economies, automation, the destruction of capitalist structures as a whole, etc.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.worldEnglish
      73·
      1 year ago

      That would be great in the fully automated space gay commune, until then though we don’t want artists to starve.

        • ComicalMayhem@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          1 year ago

          For some reason a lot of the Internet relates communism with homosexuality. I think maybe because heterosexual people established capitalism? Idfk

          • berg@lemm.eeEnglish
            2·
            1 year ago

            I guess just homophobic slander? To be fair I read it as a “space joyful commune”, which seemed to make most sense. Giving it the benefit of the doubt…