• bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The more I think about the Fermi paradox, the less interesting it gets. The great filter isn’t necessary. It’s just the distances.

    • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The distances don’t account for the complete, total lack of evidence, though. Our civilization is detectable to dozens of light years at least, if you’re looking. And we are looking. So, the others… Where are they?

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Right, a few dozen light-years is like… Less than a rounding error lol. The Milky Way galaxy alone is like 100,000 light years across, and around 1000 light years thick. If we treat the Milky Way as a cylinder, that’s a volume of roughly 8 trillion cubic light years to sift through.

          Granted, a cylinder is a massively naive simplification for calculating the volume of the galaxy and probably way overestimates things. But even dropping that estimate down several orders of magnitude, billions, or even millions of cubic light years is still an unimaginably large region to search for life. And that’s just one galaxy. There’s billions of galaxies (that we know of), and some are even bigger than the Milky Way. Searching through all of that for life, especially when we don’t really know exactly what to look for, is a hilariously huge task.

          • nifty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            53 minutes ago

            It’s easy to say “we’re just separated by time and space” but that discounts why there’s no evidence of current or past life even somewhere close like Mars, where life on Earth formed after the formation of Mars. Why can’t we find simple cell fossils?

            It could be that life formation is a slow process, or rare process, so that means intelligent life may be even rarer. To me that means every wasted human life and potential is a crime on a cosmic level. The most precious commodity in the universe may be the human brain, as far as we know.

            If there is another intelligent species that develops space travel, then we better hope to God that they’re woke otherwise why wouldn’t we logically expect them to do to us what we do to cows or chickens.

          • bstix@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I doubt any civilisation has made intergalactic travel. There are enough worlds in any galaxy that there is very little purpose in venturing to another galaxy. The distance between galaxies is also insane. Even with faster than light warp speeds it would take thousand of years to reach a different galaxy.

            • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              I definitely agree. I’m more just talking about the search for life though, not necessarily going for a visit lol. If we somehow search our entire galaxy for life and don’t find any, naturally the next step would be to start looking through another galaxy - I’m just trying to illustrate just how massive a search that would be.

        • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          There are habitable planets orbiting about one in five stars. So a few hundred habitable worlds in that range. Why do none of them transmit?