Should I still isolate myself after a positive test? Is it ok to do my own shopping (with a mask) or should I call someone? Do I still wait for a negative test or simply to be free of symptoms? Since people around me don’t really talk about Covid anymore and my country doesn’t have any guidelines in place, I’d be interested in your takes. I don’t wanna be a d*ck to others but would also rather not overshoot and lock myself up at home for two weeks like in the early days. (I hope this doesn’t count as asking for medical advice.)

Edit: Thanks y’all. Guess I just needed to hear that even though everyone has been talking of “after Covid”, the situation hasn’t fundamentally changed despite our lives having normalized. I’ll be cancelling plans and staying home.

  • CarlCook@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is my very personal take on this and by no means a recommendation, but here is how I do it:

    If I feel seriously sick, that means: more than a common cold, I limit my social interactions to the bare necessary minimum. I will still do my own groceries (if possible outside rush hours) but sanitise my hands thoroughly, wear a fitting ffp2-mask and generally make a conscious effort to take hygiene much more seriously

    By now, anybody vulnerable has had the chance to get sufficiently vaccinated so that I don’t feel it is justified to lock myself up.

    • Melkath@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if you just have common cold you shouldn’t be going out and infecting other people.

      That last line is just a petty excuse for you not wanting to be a decent and responsible person.

      • CarlCook@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        As I said: I limit social interaction to the most minimal. And from what I‘ve understood during the pandemic, my precautions should reduce possible infection by over 95%. And at least where I live there are no signs that Covid poses any bigger risk to public health than the common flu (where I also get my shots and behave accordingly after living through a full blown infection).

    • SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve had 6 covid vaccinations and I’m still not protected. It’s not a case of “having the chance to get sufficiently vaccinated” if the vaccines don’t work on your immunosuppressed body, or if you can’t have the vaccine at all.

      It’s unbelievably selfish to go out when you know you have covid. How hard is it to stay home for 5 days or so when you test positive ffs?! The fact that you don’t think staying home for a few days is “justified” when you literally risk killing someone vulnerable by not isolating is frankly shameful.

      • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        At some point we need to make a decision though, Covid is in the ecosystem now, and it’s not going away, most people will have little to no symptoms worse than a cold due to natural immunity or being vaccinated. While in an ideal world people should isolate when they have something infectious, it’s not always feasible.

        Is it not on the immunocompromised to protect themselves rather than the rest of society having to change. Surely this has been an issue with other illnesses prior to 2020 and we didn’t always expect people to isolate then when they had a cold, flu, etc.

      • CarlCook@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am not saying I go out socialising. But having to care for a family often makes it necessary to go out and get stuff. Especially when your symptom free vaccinated kids still go to school.

        Anyway do I believe I pose a significantly smaller threat than those individuals that transmit the virus despite having no symptoms at all.

        So I understand your concern and I agree that it is sensible to minimise exposure and take precautions but I also believe in commensurability of measures as there will never be 100% protection of infection. And I say that having dealt with two covid infections and months of heavy post-covid symptoms.

    • Devi@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Many many vulnerable people can’t get vaccinated and even those who can aren’t immune. I know someone who died recently and had every vaccination she was offered.

      No excuse to put people at risk on purpose

      • CarlCook@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I‘m not saying I go out and about coughing in peoples faces. I try to be sensible and stick to high hygiene standards as mentioned.

        So if somebody is vulnerable or feels anxious about getting infected they should also take proper precautions. And by everything I’ve learned through the pandemic, the risk of transmission should be very minimal.

        • Devi@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Those hygiene standards do not stop transmission, just look at all the medical staff that died despite taking all the precautions.

          If someone is vulnerable then the only ‘proper precaution’ is that they stay home 24/7. Why should they do that just because people like you won’t stay home for a week now and again? It’s selfish.

          • CarlCook@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because there are so many people completely free of symptoms that still transmit the virus.

            I stick to the official regulations of my administration and they do not state mandatory isolation any more.

            • Devi@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Did you just say “other people do it by accident so it’s ok for me to do it on purpose”??

              • CarlCook@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, I said I stick to the official recommendations but do not exceed them, because I do not believe it is reasonably justified.

                • Devi@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You used two sentences, that is the second one. The first is exactly what I said

                  Do you not have morals? You feel no guilt at potentially killing someone due to your negligence?

                  • CarlCook@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    How is it negligence when I follow the official recommendations? So no, I do not feel guilt as the probability of me being the reason of somebody’s death is practically zero.

    • thonofpy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This would have been my intuitive take as well, but I do see how it’s not exactly best practice.