return2ozma@lemmy.worldBanned from community to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoThe Atlantic publishes full Signal chat messages showing military plans about U.S. strikes in Yemenwww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square35linkfedilinkarrow-up1453arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1449arrow-down1external-linkThe Atlantic publishes full Signal chat messages showing military plans about U.S. strikes in Yemenwww.nbcnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.worldBanned from community to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square35linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarenjm1314@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoReasonably secure for the average consumer, not for intelligence work.
minus-squareqprimed@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agooh, agreed. these people should have been nowhere near it - as evidenced by their incredible fuckup. as an average consumer, and barring binary or device compromise, I do trust signal and a few others to traffic info that could incarcerate or worse.
minus-squareidiomaddict@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoTo be fair, it’s also not secure for the average consumer, if they accidentally add a journalist to their gc
minus-squaresome_designer_dude@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoIntelligence work also requires intelligence. These people would be using AOL Messenger if it were 2005.
Reasonably secure for the average consumer, not for intelligence work.
oh, agreed. these people should have been nowhere near it - as evidenced by their incredible fuckup.
as an average consumer, and barring binary or device compromise, I do trust signal and a few others to traffic info that could incarcerate or worse.
To be fair, it’s also not secure for the average consumer, if they accidentally add a journalist to their gc
Intelligence work also requires intelligence. These people would be using AOL Messenger if it were 2005.