Right-wing activists using local school board races to push for greater control of public education didn’t make a dent in Tuesday’s election results.

One year away from the 2024 presidential election, voters largely rejected candidates backed by groups like Moms for Liberty that have aligned with GOP campaigns to undermine public education and restrict access to books, classroom materials and honest discussions of race, racism, LGBT+ people and gender and sexuality.

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the state’s perspective, ownership of children makes some sense. It benefits the state to have a wide range in how children are raised, and they certainly don’t want to be in the middle of it. Child Protective Services barely functions for the most extreme cases.

    But this extreme withholding of information is a bit different.

    I don’t disagree with you; I just don’t like the argument.

    • hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not ownership. From the state perspective you don’t own your children. You can’t sell them, you can’t throw them in the garbage if they’re defective. It’s just insane. At best they’re dependents.

      Shit from many “state perspectives” you don’t even own your fetus; you have less rights than it when it comes to health. Some states would rather see you die than the fetus. So much for state rights.

      Also, and that’s an argument on your philosophy; even if it’s convenient on some aspect for a state to have a parent own their child, it’s not a winning strategy. States would spend more money and time that way than presuming children are people under the care of someone.