db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year agoOpenSubtitles.org is shutting down it's previous API. Now only authenticated access allowed.blog.opensubtitles.comexternal-linkmessage-square202fedilinkarrow-up1763arrow-down133
arrow-up1730arrow-down1external-linkOpenSubtitles.org is shutting down it's previous API. Now only authenticated access allowed.blog.opensubtitles.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square202fedilink
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down11·edit-21 year agoLots of ads Edit: also tv news is also a new concept.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·1 year agoRight, so ads aren’t a recent development.
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoAds have existed for an extremely long time. And most news has cost money since forever. Tv news is a relatively new development and TV news is entirely founded by ads and as a way to drive viewers to a channel to keep them for other programmes.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoTV news is 80 years old. It’s far from new.
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoAgain, that was not my point.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoNot sure why you keep stating it.
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoWhy are you so stuck on the tv thing?
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoBecause you keep insisting on repeating falsehoods.
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoI mentioned it as a sidenote. It’s not important, forget about it. Either way it’s subjective and honestly 80 years is not that long, but who cares 🤷
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoHow is something 80 years old “new?”
minus-squarelud@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·1 year agoRelatively new compared to news. Either way it doesn’t matter, my point was that it’s funded by ads. Tv news also drives viewers to a channel which is probably the main purpose of it.
Lots of ads
Edit: also tv news is also a new concept.
Right, so ads aren’t a recent development.
Ads have existed for an extremely long time.
And most news has cost money since forever.
Tv news is a relatively new development and TV news is entirely founded by ads and as a way to drive viewers to a channel to keep them for other programmes.
TV news is 80 years old. It’s far from new.
Again, that was not my point.
Not sure why you keep stating it.
Why are you so stuck on the tv thing?
Because you keep insisting on repeating falsehoods.
I mentioned it as a sidenote. It’s not important, forget about it.
Either way it’s subjective and honestly 80 years is not that long, but who cares 🤷
How is something 80 years old “new?”
Relatively new compared to news. Either way it doesn’t matter, my point was that it’s funded by ads.
Tv news also drives viewers to a channel which is probably the main purpose of it.