petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoIt's Official: Linux Kernel 6.6 Will Be LTS, Supported Until December 20269to5linux.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up1121arrow-down13
arrow-up1118arrow-down1external-linkIt's Official: Linux Kernel 6.6 Will Be LTS, Supported Until December 20269to5linux.competsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squaretheshatterstone54@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoWhy couldn’t it be 6.7, which has bcachefs?
minus-squareChewy@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up28·edit-21 year agoIt’s initial bcachefs anyway, which doesn’t support all features yet and still needs a lot of work. I wouldn’t run bcachefs yet on any system where an LTS kernel is necessary.
minus-squareEddyBot@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agotypically it’s based on the last kernel release of the year which gets promoted to LTS, not because of certain features
minus-squareryannathans@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoWhat is the use case for bcachefs? ZFS exists and btrfs if you need to froth over licencing
minus-squareferret@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoFaster or something. I am personally peeved they took the tiered storage thing out of it because in my eyes that was it’s claim to fame
Why couldn’t it be 6.7, which has bcachefs?
It’s initial bcachefs anyway, which doesn’t support all features yet and still needs a lot of work. I wouldn’t run bcachefs yet on any system where an LTS kernel is necessary.
Cuz 6.6.6 is coming 😈
So is christmas
Same
typically it’s based on the last kernel release of the year which gets promoted to LTS, not because of certain features
What is the use case for bcachefs? ZFS exists and btrfs if you need to froth over licencing
Faster or something. I am personally peeved they took the tiered storage thing out of it because in my eyes that was it’s claim to fame