Unless it is either perfectly perpendicular to the skin or is already somehow laying in all directions: There can only be one direction. Given a mole moves in tight spaces backwards and forward, both would make sense.
This is a mathematical problem with no solution, there has to be a cowlick on a sphere. Perhaps the mole avoids this problem by not being a sphere, where there is a possible solution
Unless it is either perfectly perpendicular to the skin or is already somehow laying in all directions: There can only be one direction. Given a mole moves in tight spaces backwards and forward, both would make sense.
Maybe their fur is like a sequin sweater
deleted by creator
This is a mathematical problem with no solution, there has to be a cowlick on a sphere. Perhaps the mole avoids this problem by not being a sphere, where there is a possible solution
It’s very short and perpendicular to the skin. It feels like velvet.
But it’s not completely covered in fur. A partially hairy sphere doesn’t need a cowlick.
deleted by creator
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hairy_ball_theorem
Someone else covered it in another reply, but moles have bald areas. Hairy Ball only applies when it’s entirely covered.
Edit: other comment
Cowlick doesn’t go against what the post is saying
Their hair can lay in any direction at anytime
It’s not saying that you can make their hair all perfect in any direction.
A topological sphere so unless moles are actually a torus then it’s still not possible.
Good news, vertebrates are tori
Unless they wear a whig.
they are however usually not hairy on the inside