In its decision permitting an evangelical Christian web designer to refuse service for same-sex weddings, the court again embraced an expansive view of religious interests at the expense of protections for LGBT people.
It makes me confused why this was even needing Supreme Court unless lower courts just ignore the wedding cake case? Can’t the Supreme Court just say see such and such ruling, and not even take the case? Just overturning it?
It makes me confused why this was even needing Supreme Court unless lower courts just ignore the wedding cake case? Can’t the Supreme Court just say see such and such ruling, and not even take the case? Just overturning it?