• lich_hegemon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Users are people capable of making their own choices. It they don’t like the moderation approach they can just make a new account elsewhere. You don’t get to tell them what they like.

        • Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It hurts both their users and us. The federation is now more divided for no good reason.

          If they wanted to create a private community from the start that would be perfectly fine. But they let people sign up and create big communities that everyone else now relies on and then defederated. Isn’t that a bit irresponsible?

          • kestrel7@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Isn’t it a bit irresponsible to let bigoted trolls post a lot of dick pics? Because that’s what was going on. You’re talking about [theoretical problems], but the mods of Beehaw made a (possibly flawed) call during an emerging situation to avoid a lot of [actually existing problems].

            • Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Are you saying that the only possible actions are to allow trolls or defederate? It seems to me that there are also other, better solutions. If their decision was flawed, we should be able to criticize it.

              • ultranaut@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Lemmy seems to be fairly basic and limited currently when it comes to moderation, especially across instances.

                  • ultranaut@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    I don’t think that’s a realistic solution right now so it makes sense they wouldn’t try to do that. Scrambling to come up with a bunch of custom features using random volunteers is not likely to go well and won’t solve the problem within a suitable timeline. They are definitely talking about what kind of improvements they want and are coordinating with the admins of the other instances so everyone is on the same page. From everything I’ve seen everyone involved is doing the best they can and trying to work towards improving Lemmy. That’s great you can help with dev work, it looks like there’s going to be a whole bunch of things to do so I’d encourage you to check out the Lemmy github and see where you can help out.

      • eta_aquarid@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I see, you see Lemmy as being one big community, rather than separate communities that can interact with each other

        so you see defederating as like locking away a part of the community, rather than a community deciding to lock up for a bit

        • Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          The community didn’t decide this as far as I know. It was the owners who did it and informed their community after the fact. If there was some kind of vote and I missed it, let me know.