fossilesque@mander.xyzdeleted by creator to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoResourcesmander.xyzimagemessage-square228linkfedilinkarrow-up1850arrow-down146
arrow-up1804arrow-down1imageResourcesmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzdeleted by creator to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square228linkfedilink
minus-squareflamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down4·1 year agoBut image if we can provide so much for 8.5 billion, it means we can provid double for 4 billion. There is no reasonable excuse to keep increasing the human population.
minus-squaregandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 year agonumbers must go up
minus-squarerainwall@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down9·1 year agoThose 8.5 billion are producing all of that 100%. If you had 4 billion, it would be 45%.
minus-squareEq0@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·1 year agoProduction is absolutely not the bottleneck, here. We are producing too much, constantly.
But image if we can provide so much for 8.5 billion, it means we can provid double for 4 billion. There is no reasonable excuse to keep increasing the human population.
numbers must go up
Those 8.5 billion are producing all of that 100%. If you had 4 billion, it would be 45%.
Production is absolutely not the bottleneck, here. We are producing too much, constantly.