• xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean, he can’t. Even if he claims to have the executive power, even if he found a bunch of lackeys willing to try to do it for him, he can’t do it. Whatever he did would be unenforceable. You can’t just turn off the Internet. That’s literally the reason we invented it in the first place, it’s a communication network resilient against nuclear strikes and war and bad-faith governance all at once.

    He could probably make it very hard to use, given a lot of time, but he’d be eaten alive by the angry populace long before it ever reached that point.

    • Max@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      How many internet service providers would have to go along before the internet was effectively off? 3? 4?

      • MrShankles@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        You wouldn’t need an ISP to have servers communicate, if push comes to shove. So maybe “effectively off” as we know it, but damn near impossible to stop communication if people need it