we live in hell

I don’t even understand the pitch? you have the disc playing, in your hands, your ownership, no buffering, no subscription required. and they’re saying…hey do you want a worse experience?

  • corbin@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yep, most of them won’t complain if you just never connect them to Wi-Fi during setup.

    • piecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s a pretty good chance they’ll get around it- if they aren’t already.

      Samsung TV? You have a Samsung phone? There’s an easy way to jump the air gap.

      Neighbor has a TV connected to the Internet? Send data to that TV and pretend you’re not connected to anything so the user doesn’t catch on.

    • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I have never had any smart TV complain (yet) that I have never once connected wifi. I am guessing there would be lawsuits, that a physical device requiring internet and requiring you to connect it just to function, would get sued in a class action of some kind. I use other connection systems via HDMI to transcode media, and even people who still want TV do not need to connect the TV itself to wifi, since it should all come over through HDMI ideally (or DP or whatever cables it may be.)

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        You’re going to love this free tv then. It’s free, and people has began receiving this tv since the last 3 months or so. In exchange for receiving this free tv, you’ll have to make some sacrifice:

        • The tv must be connected to internet at all times within 5 days of receiving it. You aren’t allowed to disconnect it (except due to brief internet outages)
        • There is a second screen on the bottom with camera that display ads. You aren’t allowed to obscure the second screen to hide ads.
        • No modification allowed. You can’t disconnect the second screen.
        • You aren’t allowed to block ads, even with pihole.

        Breaking the ToS means your credit card would get charged $1000. Very fun TV.

        • LukeMedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          This may not be a popular opinion, but I personally see no issue with this if the terms of service and use are made clear and transparent before you order the device. Would I personally recommend or use the product? Hell no, but people having an informed choice, and choosing to accept these terms is perfectly fine imo.

          • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            I agree with you. Instead of spending money to buy a smart tv and still getting ads and your data collected, I can see the appeal of paying $0 to get a smart tv riddled with ads and data collection. At least you’re not paying any money for the device. I just wish the opposite is also possible where you can buy a smart tv with zero ads and data collection.

        • corbin@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It does all those things because you explicitly agree to it before getting the TV. Not the same as paying outright for a TV that somehow needs a constant connection.