• lorez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah stop using them to manufacture goods sold in the West, see how well they fare…

        • arin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Uhh then they have more resources? And we have less affordable goods.

          • AlijahTheMediocre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            The modern Chinese economy is very dependent on trade with the West and other East Asian nations that are generally more favorable of the west.

            Those resources aren’t shit if they can’t make them into shit others will buy.

            • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              That’s not really true. Much of China’s economic growth in recent years has been driven by internal demand and not foreign investment.

          • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yes congrats on proving that economics really is a zero-sum game and every econ professor has been wrong this whole time.

  • Jajcus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Isn’t that their long national tradition? Like with paper technology, silk technology or porcelain technology?

  • u_tamtam@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    No better way to boost diversion, and probably a net win for the planet considering how dirty and environmentally harmful the rare earth supply chain is today.

    • Longpork_afficianado@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      If it were a ban on the rare earth minerals themselves, yes, but a ban on the extraction technologies just secures dependence on Chinese sources.

      The reason China is a major exporter of these minerals has less to do with their availability in China and more to do with their lax environmental regulations, which allow extraction via means that are prohibited in many other countries.

      So preventing their extraction in countries where stricter environmental standards are in place just means more environmental damage.

  • lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I wonder when these poor resources will be liberated. The regions in China which have these resources must be freedomized.

  • XTornado@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    The pot is boiling, the countdown is starting… We will see how long more until they hit Taiwan.

  • nekandro@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Anyone who knows anything about China’s REE processing industry should be terrified. They’re so far ahead it’s not even funny.