☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
- 11.7K Posts
- 9.84K Comments


It’s about as productive as trying to turn a lion vegetarian.
I’m perfectly calm and nobody is upset here. I’m simply explaining to you that your argument does not make sense. If you want to look at negative sides of the trade-off then come up with some arguments that make logical sense. It’s quite telling that you start making personal attacks when you can’t actually address the points being made.
Romans were a product of their society.
I genuinely don’t know what you’re arguing anymore, because your logic is completely backwards. You’re blaming the GPL for “enshitification” and bloat, which is utterly nonsensical. The license has fuck all to do with how lean or bloated a piece of software is, that’s a result of developer priorities and corporate roadmaps. The GPL’s entire purpose is to enforce freedom, and a key part of that freedom is the right to fork a project and strip out the bloat yourself if the main version goes off the rails. You then admit that corporate contributions are valuable, but your proposed solution is to letting them keep their work proprietary which is the very thing that accelerates enshitification. You’re arguing that to stop companies from making software worse, we should give them a free pass to take public labor, build their own walled gardens, and contribute nothing back. That’s just corporate apologia that encourages the exact freeloading the GPL was designed to prevent. Your entire point is a self-contradictory mess.
What I’m saying is that you could make an architecture similar to M1 which would have the same benefits of being fast and energy efficient, and slap a tailored Linux distro on top of it that just work out of the box. As a dev, I’d buy a decently built laptop like that in a second.
No, GPL does not force companies to do that. It forces companies to make their source code available. There is zero requirement that it has to be contributed to the original project, nor do the maintainers of the project have to accept changes they don’t want. You’re completely misrepresenting the how GPL works here.
Centralization, bloating, and GPL are all orthogonal concepts that bear no direct relation to each other. A centralized project does not necessarily become bloated, nor does GPL play any role in whether a project is centralized or not.
GPL because abstract freedoms are meaningless. The goal should be to ensure that the code stays open and that corps aren’t freeloading of it.
I’m really amazed that it’s been half a decade now and nobody has made a comparable SoC using ARM or RISCV tailored to Linux.
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPMto
United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml•The US Empire Keeps Getting Creepier
4·2 days agoThat’s the whole imperial boomerang effect.
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPMto
United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml•Palantir CEO Says a Surveillance State Is Preferable to China Winning the AI Race
4·2 days agohe is filthy rich and claims to be a wellness fanatic, this doesn’t add up
He’s trying to make himself relatable to the hoi polloi.
Yeah, Russia should’ve just let the ethnic cleansing in Donbas continue. At lest you fascists have consistent values from Gaza to Donbas.
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPto
Europe@lemmy.ml•Europe Is Losing - The China Trade War Is Collapsing the Entire EU Economy
5·2 days agoRight, the trade war with China is ultimately driven by the US, and the EU is just doing what it’s being told even as the US actively fights a trade war with the EU as well.
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPto
Technology@lemmy.ml•China is winning AI race, Nvidia says, as OpenAI begs US gov't for bailout
9·2 days agoFrankly, I’ve never really understood the logic of bailouts. If a company is not solvent, but it’s deemed to be strategically important then the government should simply be taking a stake in it. That’s what would happen on the private markets with another company buying it out. The whole notion that the government should just throw money at the failing companies with no strings attached is beyond absurd.
Completely agree, MacOS is turning into a dumpster fire. They keep adding features nobody asked for, and making the whole thing more bloated and flaky in the process.
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPMto
United States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml•Palantir CEO Says a Surveillance State Is Preferable to China Winning the AI Race
17·3 days agoAs a side note, Karp seems to think most people’s concern with surveillance is that they are going to get caught cheating for some reason. For instance, when giving an example of what he thinks is a valid skeptical question to ask about what Palantir is doing, he said, “Is this product being used to take away my right to go have a hot dog with a coworker I’m flirting with while being married? Which, honestly, I think is the god-given right of people in this country.” He later brings this up again, saying that most surveillance technology isn’t determining, “Am I shagging too many people on the side and lying to my partner?” Your guess is as good as any as to what that’s all about.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPto
Technology@lemmy.ml•China unveils power of thorium reactor for world’s largest cargo ship
1·4 days agoah makes sense



















also true 🤣