The Treeby chain gun was a .54 caliber percussion rifle that could fire 14 rounds in rapid succession. Designed in 1854, it was unlike anything else available at the time. Only two were ever made, with the hope of receiving a contract from the British Army…
Firing the Treeby rifle requires following a specific process. First, of course, each of the 14 chambers must be loaded with powder and ball, and a percussion cap placed on the firing nipple on each one. Once the weapon is all loaded, the lever on the barrel must be rotated up. The barrel is connected to the frame by way of a very coarse thread, so lifting the barrel lever pulls the barrel forward, away from the chamber. Next, the hammer is manually cocked, which rotates the chain of chambers and indexes one into position. Then the barrel lever is rotated back down, pulling the barrel in and sealing it against the chamber. Only now can the trigger be pulled, which fires the round currently sealed up to the barrel.
After firing, the process repeats until all 14 rounds are expended… The manual of arms for this rifle is likely one of the reasons is was not pursued by the British Army…
… by sealing the chamber for each shot it provides higher velocities than revolver-type designs with a gap between barrel and cylinder. The Treeby also would be very unlikely to suffer from chain-firing, in which the spark from the main chamber ignites one or more adjacent chambers… Since the chamber is fully sealed, no sparks or blast can escape in the vicinity of the open chambers.
Read the full passage: https://www.forgottenweapons.com/rifles/treeby-chain-gun/
Or watch Ian’s video: [3:00] https://youtu.be/sXpJYNQJAcQ?si=
Or the more recent Royal Armories one: [6:56] https://youtu.be/uI-jWltuSyA?si=
. 54 cal, 14 times, “rapid fire”. My shoulder would be mush…
There’s one more important variable in that equation though. Velocity. Which you can actually control because this isn’t a cartridge based design. Simply add more or less powder behind your bullet.
Also keep in mind this is ‘rapid fire’ in the context of 1854 not 2024.
Rapid fire = not kneeling down to reload while the rear rank shoots over your rank?