fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month ago"Does Hitler have a right to privacy?" and other big questions in research ethics.mander.xyzimagemessage-square175linkfedilinkarrow-up1416arrow-down110file-text
arrow-up1406arrow-down1image"Does Hitler have a right to privacy?" and other big questions in research ethics.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square175linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 month agonot exactly, but it should still be killed as quickly as possible
minus-squarelmmarsano@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 month agoWouldn’t that make you an immoral monster who “should still be killed as quickly as possible”?
minus-squareozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 month agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarelmmarsano@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 month agoMaybe if logical consistency is silly. You argued in favor of killing someone unjustifiably. Moral principles mean nothing to you?
minus-squareozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 month agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarelmmarsano@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 month agoI don’t think you’ve even broken it down to yourself. Killing a person who hasn’t done anything wrong is inherently immoral. It’s basic logic & moral reasoning.
minus-squareozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarelmmarsano@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 month agoNah, brah. It’s settled: you don’t explain it because you can’t & simply lack moral principles. The only one being “silly” about it is you.
minus-squareozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoRemoved by mod
not exactly, but it should still be killed as quickly as possible
Wouldn’t that make you an immoral monster who “should still be killed as quickly as possible”?
Removed by mod
Maybe if logical consistency is silly. You argued in favor of killing someone unjustifiably. Moral principles mean nothing to you?
Removed by mod
I don’t think you’ve even broken it down to yourself. Killing a person who hasn’t done anything wrong is inherently immoral. It’s basic logic & moral reasoning.
Removed by mod
Nah, brah. It’s settled: you don’t explain it because you can’t & simply lack moral principles. The only one being “silly” about it is you.
Removed by mod