A search for Threads content on Twitter currently brings up zero results, despite plenty of links to Meta’s microblogging rival being posted on the platform.

  • cazool@blip.cf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    This has a very “let’s de-federate from Threads” vibe.

    Don’t get me wrong the guy is a tool but it feels similar to an instance admin blocking threads and not letting users decide.

    • Makeshift@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      My gut reaction is defensiveness that the fediverse has a different motive, but no. The motive IS the same. Both are fueled by self-preservation.

      There IS a difference in circumstance, however. The fediverse has to measure potential gain vs potential risk of working with a greedy rich billionaire.

      Twitter is already a giant that’s been going through a lot of abuse and bleeding users. It stands to gain nothing from Meta’ new copycat, only lose even more.

      So, Yes. Same motivation for blocking/defederating. The difference between the two is what thy stand to gain vs what they risk losing.