• Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The early 2010s was peak BIOS design. When I built a new PC in 2022 to replace my 2014 4th gen i5 machine, I was amazed to discover that the BIOS interface in my brand new, $500 AM5 motherboard was actually worse than the one in my old $120 board.

    The old one ran at my display’s native resolution (1080p at the time), had a contemporary interface, and cool stats showing on the left and right sides of the screen. Meanwhile the BIOS in my modern PC runs at 1024x768, is mostly text-based, and so many settings are just buried several menus deep. IDK if this is an AMD problem or an AM5 problem (not a motherboard manufacturer problem cause they’re both Gigabyte boards), but it was a shock to the system for sure to see how badly the tech has regressed.

    • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I just switched to an AM5 board and at least on mine there’s a setting that enables HD resolutions, but the input works noticeably worse than on my mobo from 10 years ago.

    • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Might be an AM5 thing or that particular board, I don’t recall these particular shortcomings in my Gigabyte 12th gen Intel mobo or my friend’s Asus AM4 mobo

  • nemith@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    14 hours ago

    To be honest back in 1990 having a tui with arrow key navigation in a start up rom was pretty fucking advanced.

    • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      learning to navigate modern uis has taught me to fear software that works only with a mouse. why? Because simply it is dreadful, any modern ui has long forgotten shortcuts and traditions that I take for granted, by doing so they make themselves horrible to navigate

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      15 hours ago

      But it did teach me to fear and HATE software that doesn’t work with a keyboard.

      The fuck do you mean if I tab on this sidebar menu I end up on the close button on the other side of the UI???

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    First of all, take my upvote because the meme is funny and I’m definitely the old guys at the bottom.

    As for modern UEFI config utilities, they are, IMO, a huge step backwards in usability. Yeah, modern UEFI configuration utilities look flashy and provide more context / capabilities / help info, but most are a nightmare to actually use and practically force you to use a mouse.

    Which would be…fine, I guess, if all mice were treated equally or consistently. Most don’t respond to the scroll wheel, so you’re dragging the scroll bar like a neanderthal. Some mice work fine, others will only move the cursor around a small area of the screen, some only move in the Y axis, some only in the X axis, some mice move the cursor at a glacial pace, others zoom it at something approaching light speed and basically just teleport the cursor from one edge of the screen to the other. And a mouse that works fine to configure a Dell may or may not work fine with an HP or even a different Dell. It’s just an obnoxious crapshoot that shouldn’t exist when we have standardized HID specs for input devices like mice.

    Even on laptops, the UEFI config is often a PITA to use with the built-in pointing device(s). e.g. My ThinkPads treat the touchpad and trackpoint very differently, and neither is comfortable to use, just differently awkward.

    Using the keyboard is also annoying since it’s similar to navigating in a regular GUI and having to tab through every checkbox to get to the next settings section. And (at least) Dell UEFI designers freaking love their massive arrays of checkboxes.

    To wrap up my “old man yells at cloud” diatribe, I’ve always appreciated function over form and generally prefer a good TUI to a flashy GUI.

    • Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I own a repair shop so I’m sure my perspective comes from spending an unusual amount of time in UEFI/BIOS over the course of the years, but I find that they remain perfectly usable with a keyboard.

      Most modern UEFI have an “advanced mode” (usually F7) that is a lot closer to traditional BIOS layout and navigability. I actually get unreasonably bothered when trainees insist on fumbling around with the mouse in “Easy Mode”

      There’s so many options in modern UEFI that there are two features I’m actually incredibly grateful for:

      The “Favorites” systems, so that you can have all of the settings you’ll actually change all in one place

      The “Profiles” systems, so that you can easily hop between configurations

      Without those, the onion meta-game of finding options that are arranged differently on AMD vs Intel or between different motherboard vendors is a rough time.

        • Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Everything I described relates mostly to motherboards for custom builds (ASUS, MSI, Gigabyte, etc)

          Dell doesn’t have an “Advanced Mode” and profiles are limited to one “save as custom user settings” option.

          Unless something has changed with their absolute latest models, their UEFI usually follows a “tree” layout that is super navigable with a keyboard. Arrow keys, spacebar, and the TAB key ought to get you everywhere you need to go - the latter being necessary to jump from the tree on the left over to managing the different settings on the right.

          • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            The bios I got on my laptop has effectively 0 keyboard navigability, no shortcut to search, scroll wheel does not work, sensibility is off, somehow only works properly with the touchpad and fails to work with a generic cheap usb mouse that as as far as I can tell is fully complaint to the usb spec as I have had 0 issues with it in any OS without the need for any custom drivers, tab navigation is effectively non functional, arrow key navigation is not there at all, there a “advanced mode” that I discovered with Dell’s custom software that allows changing bios settings from a live OS with the use of custom WMI_ACPI extensions not documented anywhere that I can find from which I can enable a hidden advanced mode that simplies showa more options in the bios but doesnt overhaul the navigation, it shows very advanced options that surely shouldnt just be shown by default such as battery charge limmit, battery start charging threshhold, and many other misceleanous settings that have no reason to be labelled as “advanced”

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I’ll have to check for that.

        For work, the only thing I typically configure via the console is the iDRAC settings and do everything else from there. But in my homelab, I’ve got a bunch of late model Optiplex USFF PCs (rising electricity rates forced me to downsize from the PowerEdges I used to run). Configuring a recent batch of those was a complete exercise in frustration, and I don’t recall seeing anything like an advanced mode listed, but TBH, I wasn’t looking for it either.

        • Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          In the OEM / Laptop / Prebuilt space I’m definitely seeing move of a pivot towards graphical UEFI, that ones with forced mouse navigation are currently the exception but when I come across it I hate it.

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yea it’s almost as if not supporting mice in the BIOS was a decision as much as it was a limitation

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Give me a TUI that does not burn my eyes (i am looking at you guys who make blue TUIs!) and i am good.

      UEFI/BIOS should NOT have a GUI, as it must function properly in every possible situation, and simplicity is the key.

      Though mouse support is nice (support not forcing)

  • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I have a 486 with a mouse driven BIOS…

    Edit: Here is a screenshot I found online that looks like the one I have (note the 1994 copyright at the top):

    Mouse driven BIOS GUI from a mid 90s PC.

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      The BIOS on some old Thinkpads has a bird flapping its wings as a mouse cursor.

      My 560X from 1998 has one of those BIOSes, too.

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        17 hours ago

        lol, in this case ‘update’ would require physically replacing the ROM chip on the motherboard. Sometimes they were nice enough to make it a socketed chip.

        • Gork@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          At least the attack surface is super small right now. Probably not many viruses out in the wild targeting 486s.

  • Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I prefer that ancient American megatrends style. I find that mouse based EFI guis are always really laggy and frustrating to use with the mouse, so I end up using the keyboard anyway. Plus, I’m just here to change boot order or some random OC setting, I don’t need animations and nice graphic design. Newer bios menus just feel like a bunch of form over function when form is irrelevant.

  • chi-chan~@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Gosh, I hate those new GUI UEFI BIOS interfaces so much.

    The problem with the new ones they usually DON’T HAVE the option to change back to normal TUI-like layout.

    E: one more paragraph

    • chi-chan~@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The new ones don’t always work with the keyboard well.

      What’s the point of a software that doesn’t work well with keyboard?

      (Excluding art software like GIMP/Krita.)

  • Resplendent606@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Honestly, if your UEFI/BIOS has mouse support it is too much. My MSI board (which I really dislike) wants you to use your mouse and it is so annoying.

  • Farid@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Umm, I’m sorry to be the one to tell you, guys, but my PC has that exact BIOS screen and it’s 10 years old. They aren’t that “new”.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I had a Ryzen mobo that actually removed most of the window dressings after a bios update, because there wasn’t enough room to fit all the new cpu model names/descriptions.

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        that’s nice really. one of my old ones you had to chose between a or b version that had differing cpu support

  • brap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Ah man I loved the Award CMOS setup screens. They were the first ones I was exposed to when DIP switches went away and I never really gelled with any others since. But god damn the new ones are hot garbage to operate.