I feel like other streaming platforms will follow the same process as they’ve proven it’s worked.

  • Quokka@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So clearly some people did pay for that and it was changed at a later date…

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Absolutely they are. Didn’t say they can’t be.

          What they can’t do however is think that they’re entitled to use the service in ways that are against the terms of service.

          • rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Company decides to change the deal and terms of service to require nudes and accompanying driver’s licenses photos every 21 days in this wild hypothetical

            Whirlybird: Why do people think they’re entitled to use a private company’s service nude-free while still paying? It’s in the ToS!

            • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Whirlybird: unsubscribe if the terms of service are not to your liking

              rikonium: no I demand the other terms of service! Netflix is a human right!