GiddyGap@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.world · 10 months agoSupreme Court restores Trump to ballot, rejecting state attempts to ban him over Capitol attackapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square131fedilinkarrow-up1318arrow-down111cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1307arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court restores Trump to ballot, rejecting state attempts to ban him over Capitol attackapnews.comGiddyGap@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.world · 10 months agomessage-square131fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareDkarma@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 months agoThat’s if he’s in office. He’s not in office.
minus-squareanticolonialist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·10 months agoSec 5 is the means of enforcing sec 3
minus-square✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-210 months agoThat makes no sense. Why would But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. be included in section 3 if congress has the power to enforce (or not enforce) the clause by simple majority. It’s obviously a self-executing clause.
That’s if he’s in office. He’s not in office.
Sec 5 is the means of enforcing sec 3
That makes no sense. Why would
be included in section 3 if congress has the power to enforce (or not enforce) the clause by simple majority. It’s obviously a self-executing clause.