favoredponcho@lemmy.zipdeleted by creator to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 3 months agoDo you agree with this?lemmy.zipexternal-linkmessage-square178linkfedilinkarrow-up1906arrow-down129
arrow-up1877arrow-down1external-linkDo you agree with this?lemmy.zipfavoredponcho@lemmy.zipdeleted by creator to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square178linkfedilink
minus-squareBeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up15·3 months agoNo, it should be 10% at least.
minus-squareFlyingCircus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoWe could tax a billionaire 95% of their wealth, and they would still have more money than you or I could reasonably spend in a lifetime.
minus-squareBeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoOh yeah, I’m a big proponent of no more billionaires. But it appears to a lot of average people smaller amounts are more palpable because they think they’ll ever be that rich.
No, it should be 10% at least.
We could tax a billionaire 95% of their wealth, and they would still have more money than you or I could reasonably spend in a lifetime.
Oh yeah, I’m a big proponent of no more billionaires. But it appears to a lot of average people smaller amounts are more palpable because they think they’ll ever be that rich.