𝙈𝙞𝙖@quokk.au to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 days agoOhio Dem Party Has Banned Criticism Of Gov. Candidate Amy Acton Calling Trans Girls “Boys”www.erininthemorning.comexternal-linkmessage-square113linkfedilinkarrow-up1203arrow-down110file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1193arrow-down1external-linkOhio Dem Party Has Banned Criticism Of Gov. Candidate Amy Acton Calling Trans Girls “Boys”www.erininthemorning.com𝙈𝙞𝙖@quokk.au to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 13 days agomessage-square113linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
cross-posted from: https://quokk.au/c/usa/p/1051767/ohio-dem-party-has-banned-criticism-of-gov-candidate-amy-acton-calling-trans-girls-boys
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day ago which was ignored Does not appear in the quote. If you have another source for that claim, it’s weird that you haven’t shared it by now. Where do you get the idea that they were allowed to resubmit the post? Fair, I’ll rephrase: you cannot demonstrate that they were not allowed to resubmit the post.
minus-squareSnoopSqueak@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agoI do not have a facebook account to see the group page for myself. According to the article, the criticism was not reposted. It was banned there, as reflected by the headline.
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agoSo you don’t know. Like I’ve said on every loop.
minus-squareSnoopSqueak@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agoI know what the article and the headline say. Your initial criticism is still invalid. Can you find a source that says they were allowed to resubmit the post?
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day ago I know what the article and the headline say Congratulations? Your initial criticism is still invalid. It’s not. Can you find a source that says they were allowed to resubmit the post? Why would I do that when it’s not my claim? The onus is on you to show that they were disallowed.
minus-squareSnoopSqueak@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·20 hours ago Why would I do that when it’s not my claim? The onus is on you to show that they were disallowed. If you can disprove the contents of the article you chose to criticize, please do.
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·9 hours agoDisprove what about them, beyond what I already have?
Does not appear in the quote. If you have another source for that claim, it’s weird that you haven’t shared it by now.
Fair, I’ll rephrase: you cannot demonstrate that they were not allowed to resubmit the post.
I do not have a facebook account to see the group page for myself. According to the article, the criticism was not reposted. It was banned there, as reflected by the headline.
So you don’t know.
Like I’ve said on every loop.
I know what the article and the headline say. Your initial criticism is still invalid.
Can you find a source that says they were allowed to resubmit the post?
Congratulations?
It’s not.
Why would I do that when it’s not my claim? The onus is on you to show that they were disallowed.
If you can disprove the contents of the article you chose to criticize, please do.
Disprove what about them, beyond what I already have?