• fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      19 days ago

      Because not all rough sleepers are technically “homeless” and not all homeless people sleep rough.

      For example, a domestic abuse escapee has a home, it’s just not safe to be in, so runs away and sleeps rough.

      The other way round, many homeless are sleeping on a friend’s sofa, for example.

      • nialv7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        isn’t this more reason to use the term homelessness? people who are homeless but don’t rough sleep still do need help finding a home. like obviously solving rough sleeping means giving them a home, not finding them a friend’s sofa to sleep on?

        • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          I guess they’re specifically looking at rough sleeping, as it’s one of the very visible manifestations of homelessness - both easier to track who needs support - and from a political perspective, easier to tell people you’ve solved it.

          Wider homelessness is a much larger issue, harder to solve and harder to prove that you’re “doing well at it”.

      • TWeaK@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        Most homeless women find a place for the night. Staying on the streets is too dangerous for them.

        Many homeless people don’t want to sleep inside or under other peoples’ rules. I worry the subtext of this story is that Burnham is going to criminalise sleeping outside.

        • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 days ago

          I have the same worry - though I’m hopeful that won’t be the case. The article sounds quite positive about it, but we’ll see what actually happens!

    • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 days ago

      Because homelessness covers more than rough sleeping.

      Sleeping on a mates sofa or in a hostel would still count as homeless but not rough sleeping.