• ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    The UN headquarters agreement grants immunity to world leaders when travelling to New York for these events

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          True, but it does have Permanent Observer State status. But it’s a moot argument either way as the immunity given by treaty explicitly extends to anyone invited by the UN to conduct “official business”.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        It is unclear, however, if the US move to deny or revoke visas complies with that document

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Use full quote from the article and see how stupid that sounds.

          It is unclear, however, if the US move to deny or revoke visas complies with that document, which outlines that foreign officials’ attendance in New York should not be impeded by the US, “irrespective of the relations” between their respective governments and the US.

          • ryannathans@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 days ago

            Your argument is that if the US govt breaks their own law to prosecute their ally who has immunity then they can do it?

            Sure, people can do whatever they want at the end of the day and this is meaningless time waste