Access to this page has been denied
thehill.com
px-captcha

Wasn’t quite sure what community to post this…

A recent EnhancV survey of 1,000 full-time U.S. workers subject to new or stricter return-to-office policies found that 72 percent suspect these mandates are really a voluntary attrition strategy — a strategy by their own employers to make them quit their jobs.

The damage is strategic, not merely emotional. Baylor University’s reporting on office mandates and brain drain found that firms with mandates faced greater turnover among women, senior employees, managers and high-skilled workers, while job vacancy duration increased and hiring rates declined. In other words, the people with the most options are often the first to leave. The employees who remain may not be the most committed — they may simply be the least mobile.

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    4·
    3 days ago

    What makes you think that employers actually care if you’re happy? Or that they care about society or the environment?

    The only exception seems to come from those who live alone and where work is their only physical social contact.

    I have colleagues with small kids at home. They like coming into the office because the nippers distract them too much.

    My employer tried imposing post-Covid RTO mandates on us, compliance was slow and reluctant, but they soon realized that they were better off selling off and/or subletting the massive office space we had. Now, a new RTO mandate would be impossible to implement because there aren’t enough desks or floor space. And that’s just fine. Our capex is much lower, opex has gone down a bit too. It’s absurd anyway. My team is mainly made up of contractors, my customers are also non-local, they’re based in different cities, so my meetings with them have to be online whether I WFH or I’m in the office. I’d rather be at home, the coffee is better and I can take conjugal breaks without distressing my coworkers.