• gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      There are no “bad tenants”, because that would imply inconveniencing landlords and costing them money is morally wrong. It’s not, it’s funny as hell😭

      • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        5 days ago

        100% they’re bad tenants. They’re also people who never want to own, they’re people that will never be able to afford to own. There will always be a need for land lords

            • Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              5 days ago

              Sure, under our current system. But you said there will always be a need for landlords, which I take issue with. But housing doesn’t have to operate the way it does now. There’s a variety of ways to pay for people to have housing under a money-based system, like through taxes. The soviet union had housing cooperatives. Hell, you don’t even need to go that far, housing prices are currently so high because we allow massive real estate corporations to buy up property to artificially inflate price. Government regulation on real estate as an industry would serve to lower housing prices. At the very least, make it so they can’t just sit on vacant homes.

              • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                But that’s IF the government would build said housing. Or it takes it away from owners which is fucked. I’m all for government owned housing if they will build it and maintain it. It could lower housing prices and rents, your right if they build enough of them where needed

            • Seb the goblin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Only within a relatively recent stretch of history, before that you only needed to pay for fancy stuff (think pyramids or castles or whatnot)

              • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                You can say that about a lot of things, matter of fact now, you have to pay for housing, there is no fantasy land where you don’t and won’t in our life time

        • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Nah that’s stupid. Why do you presume to know that there will “always” be a need for landlords? People thought there would always be kings until democracy developed, people thought there would always be nobility until capitalism emerged and rendered the land-based social relationships that defined feudal nobility meaningless. You lack imagination.

          • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Ok, in our life times we will always need landlords. I know future generations could have a different setup. We can’t product the future. Maybe AI will lead to government built housing and UBI. We don’t know.

              • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I think you don’t realize how slow it will be to get to that point. I am a land lord, what’s the government going to do, take my land and property?

                • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Individual landlords would not be a priority for me, I would start by prohibiting LLCs from owning residential property, convert existing apartment complexes into residential co-ops/condos, and force existing corporate landlords to sell their properties to individual buyers at a cost determined by the state.

                  For individual landlords, I’d just prohibit them from acquiring new properties they don’t live in themselves, and make it illegal to transfer ownership of a rental property to anyone else unless they intend to live in it (eg via inheritance, sale, etc.).