• Sergio@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    12 days ago

    Great question. idk about Sharrock but:

    Individuals with hyperthymesia can recall extensive details of their own lives, along with public events that hold personal significance.[7] They often describe their memories as uncontrollable associations: when presented with a date, they immediately “see” a vivid depiction of that day without conscious effort.[8] These memories are strikingly detailed but not literal recordings of experience. In the case of Jill Price, anonymised as “AJ” in the 2006 study by Parker, Cahill and McGaugh,[1] her recollections resembled a movie running in her mind, yet she could not remember incidental details such as what her interviewers were wearing hours earlier.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperthymesia

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Shit think I have this! I too can do that, and my earliest memory is from when I was 6 months old. Yes I can pull them up with great details. But to ask the same questions how can I know if it totally real or my imagination filling in the details? Guess we can’t know but I can pull up great details of all of my childhood. The bad and the good so really sucks remembering everything with that much detail.

      • Sergio@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        You should contact some of those researchers. There’s only a couple hundred people with this characteristic, they might have a survey or interview for you. It’s a pretty interesting cognitive ability to study, it’ll probably lead to some insights into human cognition in general.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      That description of being shown the event seems to me like not a memory but more like being shown what happened.

      Of course we will interpret that as a memory but it may not be. It could be a literal connection to what happened at that time. We only think it’s a memory because that’s the closest thing we know.

      Just thoughts about it.

      • Sergio@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        I was thinking it’s kind of like an AI “hallucination”. It’s a plausible (but not necessarily accurate) representation of what happened. I wonder in what ways those memories change over time.