• realitista@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think if the real goal was social democracy they’d just call it that. I do think Bernie (as the primary torch bearer of the term), does want to nationalise much of private business in the end, but is starting with standard social democracy to get the ball rolling. Many of the others may actually just be social democrats who are on the Bernie bus because that’s the one going somewhere.

      • [email protected]@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        True, but DSA is a large, national organization that’s been around for decades, so that implies both institutional inertia and factionalism. It may be a group of both social democrats who don’t feel welcomed in the democrat party and actual socialists who may not see any other viable alternative available to them.

        • realitista@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes there is definitely something to creating a unified front between both camps, and I have no problem uniting under this banner, at least up until the point we take over the Democratic party in a stable enough way to start splitting hairs on policy.

          • [email protected]@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            That makes sense. Although we can dream about left unity, the differences between some of the folks in the party may be to great to reconcile (i.e., a lot of people in the party are not left at all).