• Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The difference between it being an option and it being mandated is that when the level of greed we see today is allowed to exist, then it will exist, and power will slowly and inevitably be taken away from the worker class.

    There are also multiple types of socialism, and socialism doesn’t necessarilly mean government ownership specifically. Check out Professor Richard Wolff’s excellent lectures on the topic.

    • realitista@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are also multiple types of socialism, and socialism doesn’t necessarilly mean government ownership specifically.

      That’s why I wish there was better understanding of social democracy.

      • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I understand social democracy very well and I don’t think it’s a good system because the capitalist class ultimately stays in charge, which will inevitably lead to corruption and the slow reverting of social services. I used to be a social democrat myself around when Bernie started to run for president the first time, so I understand why the premise is popular.

        My idea of socialism includes:

        • Workers owning the businesses they work for with no exceptions, which eliminates worker exploitation and enshittification
        • Having a hard wealth cap (both realized and unrealized) of between $10-50 million tied to inflation
        • A universal basic income that is enough to thrive, which will allow people to persue hobbies and become entrepeneurs without fear of failure
        • Having all basic necessities be guaranteed and universally available without means testing (healthcare, housing, utilities, food, etc.)
        • A universal right to dignity and privacy (eliminate mass surveillance both from governments and from companies, police and prisons must treat people with respect, similar to the Norweigan system)
        • Create a government organization that publicly audits code to ensure that neither malicious foreign or domestic actors have the ability to hack into computers to the best of their ability, and have a state bug bounty program for all open source code
        • Have the government own essential infrastructure as voted on by the people (public infrastructure, prisons, the military, schools, etc.)
        • Have a more direct form of democracy, eliminating representatives in favor of direct voting on legislation wherever possible to aid in abolishing corruption
        • Eliminate the Supreme Court’s ability to unilaterally enact laws
        • Public funding of elections where representatives are needed, along with a new voting system (RCV, STAR, etc. depending on what mathmeticians agree represents the people best for each individual scenario)
        • Ban all advertising, especially political. If any individual is getting paid to speak in any form that is not directly advertising, who pays must be disclosed or else face prosecution
        • Ban all for-profit news organizations, excluding independent outlets who receive their funding from small-dollar donations
        • Ensure that nobody is above the law by allowing the public as a whole to sue individuals and organizations, even if they were not directly affected by whatever crime has been committed

        And that’s just what I came up with and is by no means comprehensive.