Just to make it clear: I do not believe this and I am convinced good old human greed is what’s really driving the ai and data-center insanity. Also, LLMs are not and will never become AGI.

Having said that: if an artificial super-intelligence were to emerge, building more data-centers could well be one of it’s primary goals. Since it wouln’t be concerned with consequences for the environment or humanity, it could pursue this at any cost, with only speed and scale in mind. Convincing financial markets and business elites of the necessity of such a buildout would be the ideal way of achieving results. In this scenario, fighting this buildout by any means would be the only sensible response and of utmost importance.

It’s a somewhat funny, somewhat depressing thought for me and I literally had it in the shower. Surely I can’t be the first to come up with this, but I also can’t remember having read it before.

  • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I see. So consciousness is definitionally uniquely human because of complexity, and other complex stimulus-response is simply instinct.

    • daannii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      No. Humans have faps too.

      There is no scientific evidence that sense of self is only in humans.

          • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            A word that is just nonsensical enough to mean whatever you want it to mean, while still sounding adequately serious enough for serious discussion among serious people.

            See also: freedom.

            • daannii@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Well you can define a construct.

              In science we often use terms that are open. So we first define what we mean before discussing the construct.

              That way everyone is talking about the same thing. Otherwise it’s just arguing semantics.

                • daannii@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 hours ago

                  Perception of time is your definition of consciousness?

                  Do you instead mean memory of autobiographical events ?

                  Patient H.M lost his ability to form new memories of his experiences. (Starting after a brain surgery removed part of his memory centers as a kid). Would that count as losing “consciousness”?

                  People with dementia also lose their ability to form new memories. Though the complete loss of this ability is after the disease has progressed to severe levels.

                  People with Korsokoff disease. Sometimes called “locked in time” is also a disorder where new memory is disrupted so the individual often has no understanding that many years have passed. But they also suffer from a loss of time. Possibly because the amnesia is so extreme and complete.

                  This is why I say that time perception is part of memory.

                  People with Korsokoff are often distressed when they see their aged face in a mirror. Because to them, they have aged 20 years without experiencing the passage of 20 years.

                  Would you say these people are not conscious ?

                  You get why even defining consciousness is not particularly easy.

                  But we can’t develop explanations without a specific defined phenomenon that can be measured or identified in some way.