In a July 19 interview with a leading Democratic Senate candidate in the swing state of Michigan, CNN host Jake Tapper homed in on the U.S.–Israeli war on Iran — but he didn’t ask the candidate’s thoughts on the hundreds of Iranian and Lebanese civilians killed, nor the possibility of U.S. war crimes, and not even 18 dead U.S. soldiers. Instead, Tapper posed: “Why were you worried about offending people who support the ayatollah?”

As Michigan’s August 4 Senate primary between El-Sayed and Democratic Rep. Haley Stevens draws near, he has faced a barrage of Islamophobic attacks ranging from thinly veiled policy critiques to outright racist caricatures. The two Senate hopefuls seem to embody the forked path facing the Democratic Party ahead of the 2028 presidential cycle, with 43-year-old Stevens representing the old guard thanks to her backing by the party establishment and the pro-Israel lobby, and 41-year-old El-Sayed representing an insurgent movement skeptical of long-standing U.S. foreign policy interests and corporate capture of American politics. With the latter vision comes a form of fearmongering that’s been endemic to American politics for decades.

Nancy Khalil, an anthropologist who researches Muslims in America at the University of Michigan, called Tapper’s interview “sloppy and offensive” and pointed out that the anchor’s questions implied an assumption that because El-Sayed is Muslim and Arab, “he needs to have an opinion on this, and the opinion needs to align with whatever the media wants it to be.” That assumption is “completely racist,” Khalil said.

  • ptsdstillinmymind@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is not surprising at all. It’s the logical outcome when these Zionists have perverted any criticism of Israel as an attack. Fuck Israel

  • Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Crazy, the DSA strategy of only ever attacking people on your side is backfiring in both established parties rejecting you!? How could this happen?! The consequences of our actions?? It can’t be!

    • decolo@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The series of insane implications you are making here is incredible.

      • implying the Democratic party is on the same ‘side’ politically as the DSA

      • implying the DSA doesn’t oppose Republicans

      • implying the … Republican establishment would potentially support DSA candidates if only they didn’t attack the Democrats exclusively??

      • implying the Democratic party would be supportive of the DSA if only they were more polite, listened to their betters, and didn’t scare the billionaire donors funding both parties

      … actually I can’t disagree with that last one

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Link evidence of a prominent DSA figure that attacks Conservatives. No, Trump does not count - everyone attacks Trump at this point.

        Edit: I’m waiting dude, tick tock - meanwhile the DSA candidates have only taken seats from establishment Democrats. Weird how fucking similar they are to MAGA - but I wouldn’t expect anyone here to have the presence of mind to notice.

        • decolo@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I don’t think ‘slamming’ in a headline is too valuable politically, additionally since they have to primary an establishment Democrat to be able to participate in an election I think it’s reasonable that they will be saying negative things about that incumbent Democrat.

          If they win the primary, I would expect them to stop campaigning against the Democrat and begin campaigning against the Republican. I am not sure specifically what you want to see - a press release with a negative statement about a Republican?

          sorry I am slow, I don’t have access to a computer currently and I’m not too fast at directed search and typing on my phone.

          I will agree with you that the DSA is an insurgent movement within the Democratic party though. I am sorry if I misunderstood that. The difference I think I have with you, is that I don’t think it’s necessarily a bad strategy. The tea party successfully performed a hostile takeover of the Republican party, which demonstrates the concept works. In the current political system here, starting a new party isn’t feasible without money and time that we don’t have.