It’s unacceptable for a tool to sacrifice an iota of clarity, coherence, meaning, quality, etc. for the purpose of embedding hidden clues within the text to suggest its provenance. The idea that anything other than *my* needs should factor into the generation of text *for me* is patently offensive.
The author understanding so many of the technicalities, but somehow assuming the big company previously had their best interests at heart (and basically that the “best” and “most common” words are equivalent), is very ironic. I think they protest too much.
The author understanding so many of the technicalities, but somehow assuming the big company previously had their best interests at heart (and basically that the “best” and “most common” words are equivalent), is very ironic. I think they protest too much.