• zeroxxx@lemmy.my.id
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but it is not suitable for rage inducing title, so they choose China instead.

      • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        The double standards and american exceptionalism of the people that post CNN/WaPo/NYT news articles on foreign events…

        • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          The US has been very clear on their support for Ukrainian defenses (probably for money, never for moral reasons), while China has been faking a peace negotiatior role.

        • APassenger@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you adopt a specific outlook, the duplicity is less stark.

          Russia is attacking a sovereign nation and when they took land, they took people. To most, that makes them the bad guys.

          Backing away from that and making this a geopolitical chess game, both players have coaches. Sounds fair.

          • boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Geopolitics is never about fairness. The greater good is left to those who have powers. Iraq was a sovereign nation; but attacked, causing the deaths of their citizen, for no legitimate casus bellli. Just invent a reason, how about WMD? Yeah, that’s good enough. And Iraqi are still left to obscurity and there’s nothing they could do about it.

            • socsa@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Iraq was absolutely fucked, but what Russia is doing in Ukraine is open genocide. Their media and politicians constantly talk about eliminating Ukrainian identity. The US media and politicians constantly talked about bringing democracy to Iraq (which it still kind of has).

              The situations are comparable, but they are very different. An honest commentator would acknowledge the horrors of both if pressed, while also being able to qualify and separate that horror.

              • rolandtb303@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                bringing democracy to Iraq

                USA didn’t bring democracy to Iraq. They destroyed it. They fired all of Saddam’s army and then wondered why groups like ISIS gained hold. That constant media frenzy about “we’re winning”, Bush’s speech, WMDs, and the de-Baathification was full on propaganda. The best type of propaganda is the type where you don’t notice it and that you think you’re immune to it.

                Both USA and Russia lied about their premises. They both use “liberation” and “freeing the people” as their pathetic excuse for invading a country.

                It’s the people who suffer these wars (yes, Russian people too. Not all of them support the war, and i speculate that younger generation doesn’t support it). The governments just get their big piles of money.

              • boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                The US media and politicians constantly talked about bringing democracy to Iraq (which it still kind of has).

                This doesn’t make sense and won’t likely happen. You either conquer them or left them unstable enough (in this case, fighting each other) so it doesn’t matter if you’re there or not. The current situation is a plus to geopolical chess players, for their national interests.

                For context, Iraq is just a chess piece . it can be a pawn, bishop, rook, queen, or king or whatever. The end game is for these big players to win. Depending on strategy, Iraq can be pawned, sacrificed, or promoted to queen or whatever as long as the real player can win the game.

                And this apply to other countries as well, not just Iraq, If you got what I mean. At the end of the day, its all about the real players trying to stay winning so their national interest will remain protected.

              • kimpilled@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                1 year ago

                “But Iraq!” is literally all these people have. As if two things can’t be bad at the same time.

                • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The reason people keep bringing up Iraq is not for some “whataboutism”. It’s simpler and more significant than that: it shows a hypocrisy, and double-standards. It’s not that people are saying “what Russia is doing isn’t bad because the USA did bad” (that is whataboutism, by the way); they’re saying that the USA’s (and the world’s) feigned outrage over Russia is hypocritical because of what the USA has done. Nobody held (or intends to hold) the USA to account for what it’s done, yet everyone is demanding Russia be torn apart, torn down, everyone tried for war crimes, etc. It’s a double-standard. If the USA had been held to account for what it did, then people wouldn’t be saying “but Iraq” (and if they did, that truly would be simple whataboutism). But until there is fair application of standards, it’s fair to call the USA on its hypocrisy when it wants to pretend to be the world’s police while simultaneously (ironically, in line with behavior of actual police) causing tremendous harm itself.

                  • steltek@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Your definition of whataboutism needs a serious overhaul. It’s done to divert anger somewhere else or lessen the perceived severity.

                    Topic: China saying one thing and then covertly doing another to support an unjust invasion.

                    Thread: “But whatabout Iraq?!?!”

                    It flows from tribalist anger. Gotta point out how the other team screwed up so you don’t feel so bad when your team shits the bed.

                  • socsa@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    The difference is that most western liberals will eagerly acknowledge the horrors of that clusterfuck and denounce it entirely. Tankies on Lemmy will not engage in the same critical thought regarding this Russian genocide.

                    It’s an extremely low rhetorical bar, but a notable one nonetheless. Whenever you attempt to engage this kind of introspection around here there is a zero percent chance of being rewarded with good faith discussion. It’s mostly just conspiracies, and being called brainwashed.

                  • kimpilled@infosec.pub
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Buddy, lots of us had outrage when the US invaded Iraq. You just can’t handle when the conversation shifts from it for 5 minutes because an even worse thing is happening.

          • Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes agreed. My perspective is the latter but I can see the more myopic view creating a bad vs good narrative.

        • reddwarf@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Russia is the aggressor and the US stands with Ukraine and helps them.

          China pretends to be ‘neutral’ in a war so glaringly having a country violate the sovereignty of Ukraine but then secretly support the aggressor.

          What is so difficult to understand? Or do you purposefully try to muddy the waters by invoking “whatabout…?” and see if the countries supporting Ukraine could be slandered?

          This war could not be more clear in who is the aggressor and who try to help the violated. The fact you feel the need to point in all directions and try to steer attention away from where we should be paying attention to is in itself a despicable act, only the logical conclusion I am left with is that you somehow feel aligned with russia and it’s war path against others. You created a moral outrage where other should feel bad but the only thing you have truly done is put a stain on your character. Pathetic and shameful to be basically rooting for russia at this point.

          • ghariksforge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            US is a murderous invader that has invaded Iraq, Afganistan in my lifetime and continues to bomb many places on earth.

            Who will support victims of American agression?

          • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This war could not be more clear in who is the aggressor

            Ofc it could be clearer. For example: The US invasion of Iraq was a an actually unprovoked invasion

            You’re just late at learning about a border conflict at a time of horrible escalation and don’t have anything but imperialist propagandaof a meddling party to draw conclusions from.

            And no I don’t have the emotional energy to spare to discuss it here I just want to signal much needed dissent to people stumbling over this thread

            • reddwarf@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You prohibiting current actions because of <fill in the blank>. This attitude might seem nobel or informed but whatabout is your true argument and it gets you nowhere.

              The fact you sow doubt on the invasion of Ukraine as ‘perhaps russia had a point to start killing civilians’ is despicable and tells me you are a russian puppet or bad faith actor, just to muddy the waters.

              Imagine being against unjust invasions (and there is a point to be made for that) but when clear and present danger presents itself you use unjust invasions to justify the war of aggression perpetuated by russia. The irony probably slips right by you. Well, it would if your mindset is to ‘level’ all events as ‘the same’. Pathetic and dubious at best.

        • BROOT@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          How is saying that close military allies are supporting each other ‘AmErIcAn ExCePtIoNaLiSm’?

          Fuck off back to lemmygrad.

          • Pili@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            He is on lemmygrad, that’s how federation works.

            If you want to be in a neoliberal echo chamber, you should move to beehaw. Or back to reddit.

            • BROOT@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Maybe you’re too stupid to understand, but just because you don’t have to make another account to participate in different instances doesn’t mean anyone cares about your despot-worshiping bullshit outside of your home instance.

              • EremesZorn@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Seriously, if the .ml instance is just as infested with these disgusting people as lemmygrad, there’s no point to us participating in the discussion. Don’t engage with tankies.

            • steltek@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Pretty weird to talk about echo chambers when someone’s calling out zero value circlejerk comments.