From the article, parts pairing is “a practice manufacturers use to prevent replacement components from working unless the company’s software approves them.”
It’s the practice of preventing you from even using genuine parts. If you buy two identical iPhones, you can’t even use parts from one to repair the other. The one phone won’t accept the genuine part from the other because it’s not paired to that phone by the manufacturer’s proprietary tool.
iPhone were one of the easiest devices to steal and sell. Even conventional anti theft measures wouldn’t deter theft significantly. Because they are so popular and common stealing an iPhone just to sell parts would still be worthwhile. Making stolen iPhone parts worthless reduces incidence of theft significantly.
This is less of an issue for other manufacturers. They often have more models serving a small customer base, with significantly less retail value.
I don’t actually know the details of how Pairing or Find My iPhone works, but couldn’t they just have the parts individually report their position since they apparently already “know” which device they belong to?
They wouldn’t know their location or have a means of sending that location. This would require every subsystem to have a gps antenna, radio and battery. It would be expensive, heavy and wasteful.
I mean when they’re on a working device. The device detects that the part is not original and uses the usual system to send the position as if it was the entire iPhone. Is that not feasible?
That’s a good approach for a single device. But for millions it’s not as good. Apples current approach significantly reduces theft and the industry around theft of their phones.
There would be an excuse that your using your friends components to fix the phone. But they didn’t deregister it. It would be enough to create a viable business.
Repairers could use stolen parts and the owner wouldn’t know until apple locked their device.
It can be stopped by controlling the internet traffic to the device. Various methods, even simple DNS systems. Especially in developing economy organised crime can get cooperation with phone networks to do this.
For organised crime this problems can be worked out. But it very difficult to workaround a whitelist of only one part.
Other manufacturers don’t have the same issue as their phones don’t last as long. Nor do they have as high a resale value. Old iPhones still sell well 5+ years after release.
Google will give you big discounts for trading in iPhones that were cheaper than pixels when released when they won’t offer you anything but recycling for an equivalent year pixel. All because the iPhone resale value remains so high.
And since the DMCA makes it illegal to circumvent copy protection, they just put copy protection on the software (sometimes laughably weak - still counts!) and if you try to get around the hardware lockout you’re officially breaking the lawwww
Hope this applies to cars as well. Bust a taillight in your Ford and get your own replacement, you still have to have a dealer configure the integrated BLISS sensor.
Thanks for the clarification. I was being lazy and didn’t read it and thought that meant apple couldn’t solder the ram to the motherboard aka pairing it.
From the article, parts pairing is “a practice manufacturers use to prevent replacement components from working unless the company’s software approves them.”
It’s the practice of preventing you from even using genuine parts. If you buy two identical iPhones, you can’t even use parts from one to repair the other. The one phone won’t accept the genuine part from the other because it’s not paired to that phone by the manufacturer’s proprietary tool.
This stops theft significantly.
iPhone were one of the easiest devices to steal and sell. Even conventional anti theft measures wouldn’t deter theft significantly. Because they are so popular and common stealing an iPhone just to sell parts would still be worthwhile. Making stolen iPhone parts worthless reduces incidence of theft significantly.
This is less of an issue for other manufacturers. They often have more models serving a small customer base, with significantly less retail value.
I don’t actually know the details of how Pairing or Find My iPhone works, but couldn’t they just have the parts individually report their position since they apparently already “know” which device they belong to?
They wouldn’t know their location or have a means of sending that location. This would require every subsystem to have a gps antenna, radio and battery. It would be expensive, heavy and wasteful.
I mean when they’re on a working device. The device detects that the part is not original and uses the usual system to send the position as if it was the entire iPhone. Is that not feasible?
That’s a good approach for a single device. But for millions it’s not as good. Apples current approach significantly reduces theft and the industry around theft of their phones.
Why would it not be good? Doesn’t Find my iPhone already work with the whole network?
There would be an excuse that your using your friends components to fix the phone. But they didn’t deregister it. It would be enough to create a viable business.
Repairers could use stolen parts and the owner wouldn’t know until apple locked their device.
It can be stopped by controlling the internet traffic to the device. Various methods, even simple DNS systems. Especially in developing economy organised crime can get cooperation with phone networks to do this.
For organised crime this problems can be worked out. But it very difficult to workaround a whitelist of only one part.
Other manufacturers don’t have the same issue as their phones don’t last as long. Nor do they have as high a resale value. Old iPhones still sell well 5+ years after release.
Google will give you big discounts for trading in iPhones that were cheaper than pixels when released when they won’t offer you anything but recycling for an equivalent year pixel. All because the iPhone resale value remains so high.
I’d rather stop the company from stealing from me in unpreventable ways than the random petty thief who I can beat senseless.
Yeah, but I’ve never had a phone stolen, but I’ve broken a whole bunch of them.
I’d rather have an easily repairable phone than a supposed “deterrent” for which workarounds are eventually found.
And since the DMCA makes it illegal to circumvent copy protection, they just put copy protection on the software (sometimes laughably weak - still counts!) and if you try to get around the hardware lockout you’re officially breaking the lawwww
Hope this applies to cars as well. Bust a taillight in your Ford and get your own replacement, you still have to have a dealer configure the integrated BLISS sensor.
Section 1, 1, 3, g, C says “This section does not: Apply to: A vehicle…”
So, probably not
From the article
Fuck that sensor. It’s a made up need so I’m more dependent on the manufacturer.
Thanks for the clarification. I was being lazy and didn’t read it and thought that meant apple couldn’t solder the ram to the motherboard aka pairing it.