• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    18 days ago

    These all seem extremely sarcastic? They’re just tastelessly riffing on the Lindsay Clancey trial.

    • kcSeb - they/them@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      The amount of people around the Clancey trial who are actively defending her, and rationalising her actions, is insane. They’re mocking it, becuase its actually crazy to think there are this many people defending a murderer.

      • CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Bots and non serious people shouldn’t be taken seriously, shockingly enough.

        Prepare yourself for the reality that she’s declared innocent because, and this is important: all appearances and evidence point to the fact that she was genuinely legally insane and will be forcibly institutionalized, which the informed adults in the room recognize as the just course of action.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        I mean yes, I’m aware of why they’re doing it. The “tasteless” part is using yet another brutal murder of a young woman by her boyfriend, who is now trying to claim insanity, as a springboard to dunk on a completely unrelated case. Karoline Heintz really deserves better than having her death reduced to little more than an excuse to post twitch-chat-tier one liners.

        (Edi: sorry, for clarity - My initial comment was to point out that this doesn’t really seem like an example of Good Christians defending the boyfriend, since everyone in the image seems like they’re doing so ironically)