return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoAI agents meant to replace Meta workers made “large-scale, disruptive actions”arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square24linkfedilinkarrow-up1156arrow-down13cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1153arrow-down1external-linkAI agents meant to replace Meta workers made “large-scale, disruptive actions”arstechnica.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square24linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareh0tbeef@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 hours agoBeing below a certain employee count reduces worker protections It does not change the cost of the slop (which is currently artificially tiny)
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 hours agodo some of those protections not involve expensive machinery (like sawstop saws)?
minus-squareh0tbeef@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours agoWouldn’t something like that be machinery the saw company already owns? Does slop not involve expensive machinery?
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·7 hours agomostly thinking if you could shave off the administrative employees (like finance and marketing) you could fall below the limit)
minus-squareh0tbeef@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoThe limit for what? The bottom line is that AI is both more expensive and less productive than humans for at least 99% of tasks
Being below a certain employee count reduces worker protections
It does not change the cost of the slop (which is currently artificially tiny)
do some of those protections not involve expensive machinery (like sawstop saws)?
Wouldn’t something like that be machinery the saw company already owns?
Does slop not involve expensive machinery?
mostly thinking if you could shave off the administrative employees (like finance and marketing) you could fall below the limit)
The limit for what?
The bottom line is that AI is both more expensive and less productive than humans for at least 99% of tasks