This meme is technically based on real cases, but it’s wildly misleading by design. Paul Allen wasn’t the mastermind behind the $3 billion mortgage fraud; he was a relatively small player who cooperated with prosecutors and received 40 months. The primary perpetrator, Lee Farkas, was convicted of orchestrating the scheme and sentenced to 30 years in prison.
And the other guy wasn’t sentenced to 15 years for simply “stealing $100.” He robbed a bank, threatened the teller, and was convicted of first-degree robbery. The $100 amount is basically irrelevant to the nature of the offense.
So yes, both cases happened, but presenting them as “rich guy steals $3 billion, gets 40 months / homeless guy steals $100, gets 15 years” deliberately strips away the facts to manufacture outrage. That’s not an honest comparison; it’s meme propaganda.
I also love how absolutely nobody bothered to verify the information and just automatically started hating the rich person, which is fine. They can eat themselves alive for all I care. I’m not here to defend the rich. I’m simply pointing out that this meme is only “factually correct” in the most technically superficial sense. It deliberately removes important context and presents the information in a way designed to elicit a specific emotional response. There’s a difference between presenting facts and selectively presenting facts to manufacture outrage.
You’re right, and it’s actually not that hard to show, using actual real world examples, that the rules are stacked. Among federal criminal lawyers (and both of the examples here are federal crimes), it’s basically common knowledge that the punishment for bank robbery is unusually harsh compared to other crimes, and that the risk/reward calculus just doesn’t make any rational sense. It’s also common knowledge that white collar fraud is both easier to get away with and more lightly punished when caught.
Well you know except for all the decades people are serving in prison for wire fraud.
Also, the punishment has to fit the crime. The Mastermind perpetrator got 30 years his abortion that got a little over 3 years.
I don’t see any issue here.
Also first degree armed robbery. He threatens somebody with a weapon. I don’t know what your issue is here.
If you’re talking about how certain characters and actors and America have gotten away with serious crimes, that’s all different issue in and of itself.
In this case everyone was punished in accordance with the law.
Also spreading misinformation even with it confirms your bias is bad all around.
This meme is technically based on real cases, but it’s wildly misleading by design. Paul Allen wasn’t the mastermind behind the $3 billion mortgage fraud; he was a relatively small player who cooperated with prosecutors and received 40 months. The primary perpetrator, Lee Farkas, was convicted of orchestrating the scheme and sentenced to 30 years in prison.
And the other guy wasn’t sentenced to 15 years for simply “stealing $100.” He robbed a bank, threatened the teller, and was convicted of first-degree robbery. The $100 amount is basically irrelevant to the nature of the offense.
So yes, both cases happened, but presenting them as “rich guy steals $3 billion, gets 40 months / homeless guy steals $100, gets 15 years” deliberately strips away the facts to manufacture outrage. That’s not an honest comparison; it’s meme propaganda.
I also love how absolutely nobody bothered to verify the information and just automatically started hating the rich person, which is fine. They can eat themselves alive for all I care. I’m not here to defend the rich. I’m simply pointing out that this meme is only “factually correct” in the most technically superficial sense. It deliberately removes important context and presents the information in a way designed to elicit a specific emotional response. There’s a difference between presenting facts and selectively presenting facts to manufacture outrage.
But did he feel remorseful and turn himself in? Somehow I doubt it.
You’re right, and it’s actually not that hard to show, using actual real world examples, that the rules are stacked. Among federal criminal lawyers (and both of the examples here are federal crimes), it’s basically common knowledge that the punishment for bank robbery is unusually harsh compared to other crimes, and that the risk/reward calculus just doesn’t make any rational sense. It’s also common knowledge that white collar fraud is both easier to get away with and more lightly punished when caught.
Well you know except for all the decades people are serving in prison for wire fraud.
Also, the punishment has to fit the crime. The Mastermind perpetrator got 30 years his abortion that got a little over 3 years.
I don’t see any issue here.
Also first degree armed robbery. He threatens somebody with a weapon. I don’t know what your issue is here.
If you’re talking about how certain characters and actors and America have gotten away with serious crimes, that’s all different issue in and of itself.
In this case everyone was punished in accordance with the law.
Also spreading misinformation even with it confirms your bias is bad all around.
Thanks!
Knee jerk reactions show the worst of us.
Yeah, sorry man. I’ll try to verify the info next time